Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381346›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2018

Estimation methods for heterogeneous cell population models in systems biology.

Steffen Waldherr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stochastic reaction networks in dynamic compartment populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steffen WaldherrDepartment of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium steffen.waldherr@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-0936-579X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneity among individual cells is a characteristic and relevant feature of living systems. A range of experimental techniques to investigate this heterogeneity is available, and multiple modelling frameworks have been developed to describe and simulate the dynamics of heterogeneous populations. Measurement data are used to adjust computational models, which results in parameter and state estimation problems. Methods to solve these estimation problems need to take the specific properties of data and models into account. The aim of this review is to give an overview on the state of the art in estimation methods for heterogeneous cell population data and models. The focus is on models based on the population balance equation, but stochastic and individual-based models are also discussed. It starts with a brief discussion of common experimental approaches and types of measurement data that can be obtained in this context. The second part describes computational modelling frameworks for heterogeneous populations and the types of estimation problems occurring for these models. The third part starts with a discussion of observability and identifiability properties, after which the computational methods to solve the various estimation problems are described.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCellsComputer SimulationStochastic ProcessesSystems Biologycell ensemble modelsdensity functionsparameter identificationpopulation balance equationsstate estimationstructured population models

Identifiers

PMID30381346
PMCPMC6228475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.