Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30381282›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Perioperative Optimization With Nutritional Supplements in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer (PROGRESS): Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pablo Emilio Serrano, Sameer Parpia, Saeda Nair, Leyo Ruo, Marko Simunovic, Oren Levine, Emmanuelle Duceppe, Carol Rodrigues

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03445260 (PeRioperative Optimization With Nutritional Supplements in Patients Undergoing GastRointEStinal Surgery for Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03445260 nacompletednot on this map

PeRioperative Optimization With Nutritional Supplements in Patients Undergoing GastRointEStinal Surgery for Cancer (PROGRESS): A Randomized Placebo Controlled Feasibility Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHamilton Health Sciences CorporationRan2018 to 2020Enrolled73ConditionsGastrointestinal CancerArmsNutritional Supplements, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pablo Emilio Serrano *Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3715-6880
Sameer Parpia *Department of Oncology, Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-5622
Saeda Nair *Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-1831
Leyo Ruo *Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1598-3228
Marko Simunovic *Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-3468
Oren Levine *Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-3721
Emmanuelle Duceppe *Department of General Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-2945
Carol Rodrigues *Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1792-3031
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group · CAMcMaster University · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAImpact · CAJuravinski Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative morbidity following gastrointestinal tract major surgery ranges between 40% and 60%. Malnutrition, poor protein intake, and surgery-related impairment of the immune system and its function have been associated with postoperative infections. Supplemental perioperative nutrition may improve nutrition by increasing protein intake to influence cell-mediated immunity, thereby reducing the rate of postoperative infectious complications.

objectiveThe primary objective of our trial is to determine the proportion of eligible patients randomized in an 18-month period. The primary feasibility outcome will be to (1) stop, main study not feasible: estimated proportion of randomized patients <40.0% (40/100); (2) continue with protocol modifications: estimated proportion of randomized patients 40.0% (40/100) to 59.0% (50/100); or (3) continue without modification: estimated proportion of randomized patients ≥60.0% (60/100). The secondary objectives are to evaluate compliance with the nutritional supplements and to estimate differences in postoperative complications, global health-related quality of life (QoL), and median length of hospital stay between the groups.

methodsThis is a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled feasibility trial. The intervention comprises three nutritional supplements: a protein isolate powder (ISOlution); immunomodulation (INergy-FLD), formulated liquid diet; and carbohydrate loading (PreCovery). Patients will consume 1 serving of the protein supplement per day from the randomization time up to 6 days before surgery (30 days in total). The immunomodulation, a solution that contains arginine, protein isolate, omega-6 fatty acids, and RNA, aims to attenuate excessive inflammatory responses and to replenish nutrients. This solution will be consumed as 3 doses per day for 5 days before and after surgery. Carbohydrate loading helps to reduce the stress from surgery by decreasing insulin resistance. Patients will have 2 servings the evening before surgery and 1 serving 2-3 hours before surgery. To be eligible, patients must have a resectable gastrointestinal cancer for which an elective operation is planned. Patients will be stratified according to nutritional status. The operation should occur within 4 weeks from enrollment.

resultsWe expect to screen 165 eligible patients; 60.6% (100/165) of them will be randomized to either intervention or placebo. Assuming a two-sided alpha of .05, this will give us a 95% CI around the estimate of 53%-68%. A sample size of 50 per group will enable us to estimate the treatment effect and corresponding variance of the complication rate and QoL measures with adequate precision. The success is defined as the proportion of eligible patients randomized as ≥60.0% (60/100). Patients' compliance is defined as an intake of at least 70% (41/58) sachets of the intervention volume.

conclusionsThe results will help to determine the feasibility of a larger randomized controlled trial to implement a perioperative nutritional supplement program for patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03445260; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03445260 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/72CAmMzgP). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/10491.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal cancergastrointestinal surgerynutritional supplementsperioperative carepostoperative outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30381282
PMCPMC6257881
OpenAlexW2810209157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.