Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30380708›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Comparative Chloroplast Genome Analysis of Rhubarb Botanical Origins and the Development of Specific Identification Markers.

Yuxin Zhou, Jing Nie, Ling Xiao, Zhigang Hu, Bo Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Three MedicinalPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  13. Complete Chloroplast Genome ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gene Losses and Variations in Chloroplast Genome of Parasitic PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses of Ginger (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuxin ZhouCollege of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China. zyx123hn@163.com.
Jing NieHubei Institute for Drug Control, Wuhan 430012, China. niejingwh@sina.com.
Ling XiaoHubei Institute for Drug Control, Wuhan 430012, China. lingyun724@126.com.
Zhigang HuCollege of Pharmacy, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China. zghu0608@163.com.
Bo WangHubei Institute for Drug Control, Wuhan 430012, China. wang_bo1986@hotmail.com.

Funding

National Science Foundation of China 81603246the National Science Foundation of China 81603246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhubarb is an important ingredient in traditional Chinese medicine known as

Indexed as

PhylogenyChloroplastsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, ChloroplastGenome, ChloroplastPlants, MedicinalRheumDNA, Chloroplastcomplete chloroplast genomeidentificationRheumrhubarbultra-barcode

Identifiers

PMID30380708
PMCPMC6278470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.