Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30380017›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of public health2019

Long-term effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention on cardiometabolic health of overweight and obese women.

Vincent Wekker, Emilia Huvinen, Lotte van Dammen, Kristiina Rono, Rebecca C Painter, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Cornelieke van de Beek, Taisto Sarkola, Ben Willem J Mol, Henk Groen and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Pregnancy as a Window for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Prevention in Women: A Life-Course Perspective Based on the 2025 ESC Guidelines.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Vincent WekkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Emilia HuvinenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Lotte van DammenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Kristiina RonoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Rebecca C PainterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aeilko H ZwindermanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelieke van de BeekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Taisto SarkolaChildren's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ben Willem J MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk GroenDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annemieke HoekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Saila B KoivusaloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tessa J RoseboomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan G ErikssonUnit of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Amsterdam · NLHelsinki University Hospital · FIAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLFolkhälsans Forskningscentrum · FIUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe global prevalence of obesity in women keeps increasing. The preconception period may be a window of opportunity to improve lifestyle, reduce obesity and improve cardiometabolic health. This study assessed the effect of a preconception lifestyle intervention on long-term cardiometabolic health in two randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsParticipants of the LIFEstyle and RADIEL preconception lifestyle intervention studies with a baseline body mass index (BMI) ≥29 kg/m2 were eligible for this follow-up study. Both studies randomized between a lifestyle intervention targeting physical activity, diet and behaviour modification or usual care. We assessed cardiometabolic health 6 years after randomization.

resultsIn the LIFEstyle study (n = 111) and RADIEL study (n = 39), no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups were found for body composition, blood pressure, arterial stiffness, fasting glucose, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, HbA1c, lipids and high sensitive C-reactive protein levels 6 years after randomization. Participants of the LIFEstyle study who successfully lost ≥5% bodyweight or reached a BMI <29 kg/m2 during the intervention (n = 22, [44%]) had lower weight (-8.1 kg; 99% CI [-16.6 to -0.9]), BMI (-3.3 kg/m2; [-6.5 to -0.8]), waist circumference (-8.2 cm; [-15.3 to -1.3]), fasting glucose (-0.5 mmol/L; [-1.1 to -0.0]), HbA1c (-4.1 mmol/mol; [-9.1 to -0.8]), and higher HDL-C (0.3 mmol/L; [0.1-0.5]) compared with controls.

conclusionWe found no evidence of improved cardiometabolic health 6 years after a preconception lifestyle intervention among overweight and obese women in two RCTs. Women who successfully lost weight during the intervention had better cardiometabolic health 6 years later, emphasizing the potential of successful preconception lifestyle improvement.

Indexed as

Life StylePreconception CareAdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseBlood PressureBody Mass IndexBody Weights and MeasuresDietExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLipidsMotivational InterviewingObesityBlood GlucoseLipids

Identifiers

PMID30380017
PMCPMC6427693
OpenAlexW2898970718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.