Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379968›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Non-adherence to oral antibiotics for community paediatric pneumonia treatment in Malawi - A qualitative investigation.

Carina King, Rebecca Nightingale, Tambosi Phiri, Beatiwel Zadutsa, Esther Kainja, Charles Makwenda, Tim Colbourn, Fiona Stevenson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carina KingInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-6716
Rebecca NightingaleLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Tambosi PhiriParent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Beatiwel ZadutsaParent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Esther KainjaParent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Charles MakwendaParent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Tim ColbournInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6917-6552
Fiona StevensonResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Public Health Institute of Malawi · MWUniversity College London · GBLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumonia remains the leading cause of paediatric infectious mortality globally. Treatment failure, which can result from non-adherence to oral antibiotics, can lead to poor outcomes and therefore improving adherence could be a strategy to reduce pneumonia related morbidity and mortality. However, there is little published evidence from low-resource settings for the drivers of non-adherence to oral antibiotics in children.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate reasons for adherence and non-adherence in children diagnosed and treated in the community with fast-breathing pneumonia in rural Malawi.

methodsWe conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with caregivers of children known to have been diagnosed and treated with oral antibiotics for fast-breathing pneumonia in the community and key informant interviews with community healthcare workers (CHW). FGDs and interviews were conducted within communities in Chichewa, the local language. We used a framework approach to analyze the transcripts.

resultsWe conducted 4 FGDs with caregivers and 10 interviews with CHWs. We identified four themes, which were common across caregivers and CHWs: knowledge and understanding, effort, medication perceptions and community influences. Caregivers and CHWs demonstrated good knowledge of pneumonia and types of treatment, but caregivers showed confusion around dosing and treatment durations. Effort was needed to seek care, prepare medication and understand regimens, acting as a barrier to adherence. Perceptions of how well the treatment was working influenced adherence, with both quick recovery and slow recovery leading to non-adherence. Community influences were both supportive, with transport assistance for referrals and home visits to improve adherence, and detrimental, with pressure to share treatments.

conclusionAdherence to oral antibiotic treatment for fast-breathing pneumonia was understood to be important, however considerable barriers we described within this rural low-resource setting, such as the effort preparing and administering medication, community pressures to share drugs and potential complexity of regimens.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringResidence CharacteristicsAdministration, OralAnti-Bacterial AgentsChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantMalawiMalePneumoniaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30379968
PMCPMC6209296
OpenAlexW2899164062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.