Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379948›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Anticholinergic burden in adult and elderly people with intellectual disabilities: Results from an Italian multicenter cross-sectional study.

Luc Pieter De Vreese, Ulrico Mantesso, Elisa De Bastiani, Annachiara Marangoni, Elisabeth Weger, Tiziano Gomiero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Anticholinergics, executive function, and cognitive/behavioral changes in Down syndrome.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luc Pieter De VreeseGeriatric Center, Luigi Boni Foundation, Suzzara, Italy.
Ulrico MantessoProject DAD (Down Alzheimer Dementia) ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy.
Elisa De BastianiProject DAD (Down Alzheimer Dementia) ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy.
Annachiara MarangoniProject DAD (Down Alzheimer Dementia) ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy.
Elisabeth WegerProject DAD (Down Alzheimer Dementia) ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy.
Tiziano GomieroProject DAD (Down Alzheimer Dementia) ANFFAS Trentino Onlus, Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2931-9571
Luigi Einaudi Foundation · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults and older people with intellectual disabilities (ID) frequently receive anti-cholinergic drugs in chronic use, but no studies in Italy to date have investigated cumulative anticholinergic exposure and factors associated with high anticholinergic burden in this frail population.

aimTo probe the cumulative exposure to anticholinergics and the demographic, social and clinical factors associated with high exposure.

methodsThe 2012 updated version of the Anticholinergic Burden Score (ACB) was calculated for a multicentre sample of 276 adult and older people over 40 years with ID and associations with factors assessed.

resultsOverall, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, anxiolytics, and antidepressants were the most frequent classes contributing to the total ACB score. People living in residential care were more likely exposed to high anticholinergic burden (an ACB score of 3+): both community housing (odds ratio [OR] 4.63, 95%CI 1.08-19.95) and nursing home facility ([OR] 9.99, 95%CI 2.32-43.04). There was also a significant association between an ACB score of 3+ and reporting mental health conditions ([OR] 25.56, 95% CI 8.08-80.89) or a neurological disease ([OR] 4.14, 95%CI 1.32-12.94). Neither demographic characteristics (age and gender) nor other clinical conditions (somatic comorbidity, levels and typology of ID) were associated with higher anticholinergic load. A high burden of anticholinergic was significantly more frequent in laxative users (22.6% ACB3+ vs. 5.1% ACB 0) (p = 0.003).

conclusionsPsychotropics drugs were the highest contributors to the anticholinergic burden in adult and old age ID, especially in those people living in institutional settings with mental health and/or neurological conditions. High anticholinergic load has shown to be associated with the use of laxatives.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsArrhythmias, CardiacCholinergic AntagonistsCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleDrug InteractionsDyskinesiasFemaleAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnticonvulsantsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCholinergic AntagonistsLaxatives

Identifiers

PMID30379948
PMCPMC6209221
OpenAlexW2898834479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.