Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379946›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Cancer care and public health policy evaluations in France: Usefulness of the national cancer cohort.

Philippe Jean Bousquet, Delphine Lefeuvre, Philippe Tuppin, Marc Karim BenDiane, Mathieu Rocchi, Elsa Bouée-Benhamiche, Jérôme Viguier, Christine Le Bihan-Benjamin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Excess healthcare expenditure in adults treated for solid cancer in childhood: a cohort study in France.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philippe Jean BousquetSurvey, Monitoring and Assessment Department, Public Health and Healthcare Division, Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute-INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0217-5483
Delphine LefeuvreSurvey, Monitoring and Assessment Department, Public Health and Healthcare Division, Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute-INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Philippe TuppinCaisse nationale d'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés, département des études sur les pathologies et les patients (DEPP), Paris, France.
Marc Karim BenDianeEconomy and social science, health care systems and societies, Faculté de médecine, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4329-8807
Mathieu RocchiSurvey, Monitoring and Assessment Department, Public Health and Healthcare Division, Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute-INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Elsa Bouée-BenhamicheSurvey, Monitoring and Assessment Department, Public Health and Healthcare Division, Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute-INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Jérôme ViguierPublic Health and Healthcare Division, Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute-INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Christine Le Bihan-BenjaminSurvey, Monitoring and Assessment Department, Public Health and Healthcare Division, Institut National du Cancer (French National Cancer Institute-INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of the national Cancer Plans of France that have changed the healthcare landscape, it has become necessary to better document and assess the related actions, and to promote research and understanding. The national cancer cohort, an exhaustive population-based cohort, was set up on the basis of the National Health Data System (SNDS) by the French National Cancer Institute.

objectivesThe aim is to describe the French national cancer cohort.

methodsAll people living in France (67 million population) with universal insurance coverage and diagnosed, treated or followed up for a cancer, such as survivors, are included and will be followed up for 25 years. It contains all healthcare consumptions and reimbursements (i.e. hospitalization, outpatient care, medication…) since 2010. Every year, around 650 000 new cases are included.

resultsFrom 2010 to 2015, 6.2 million subjects have been included. Most subjects were entered in 2010, in 2015 it concerned 0.6 million. In 2015, the median age was 65 [54-76]; 51% were women. The primary cancer organ could be attributed with certitude to 87% of the people. The most frequent locations were skin (16%), breast (15%), prostate (12%), colon-rectum (11%) and lung (9%). In 2015, 40% of included subjects underwent surgery for cancer, 16% chemotherapy at hospital and 11% at least one session of radiotherapy.

conclusionBased on SNDS, the cancer cohort has been designed to study cancer care use in the short-, medium- and long-term, and evaluate healthcare and public health policies.

Indexed as

Health PolicyNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CareRegistriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30379946
PMCPMC6209307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.