Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379944›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States.

Ellen W Clayton, Colin M Halverson, Nila A Sathe, Bradley A Malin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Patient-Centered Equitable and Safe Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ellen W ClaytonCenter for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0308-4110
Colin M HalversonCenter for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Nila A SatheVanderbilt Evidence-Based Practice Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, and Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.
Bradley A MalinCenter for Genetic Privacy & Identity in Community Settings, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America.

Funding

Genetic Privacy and Identity in Community Settings - GetPreCiSeRM1HG009034 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CLAYTON, ELLEN WRIGHT, MALIN, BRADLEY A. · 2016 to 2024
$8.3M
VGER, the Vanderbilt Genome-Electronic Records ProjectU01HG008672 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C., RODEN, DAN M · 2015 to 2019
$5.1M
A Risk Management Framework for Identifiability in Genomics ResearchR01HG006844 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MALIN, BRADLEY A. · 2012 to 2019
$2.4M
LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical ApplicationR01HG008605 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CLAYTON, ELLEN WRIGHT, LAWRENZ, FRANCES PATRICIA · 2016 to 2018
$2.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006844NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008605NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG009034NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns about genetic privacy affect individuals' willingness to accept genetic testing in clinical care and to participate in genomics research. To learn what is already known about these views, we conducted a systematic review, which ultimately analyzed 53 studies involving the perspectives of 47,974 participants on real or hypothetical privacy issues related to human genetic data. Bibliographic databases included MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and Sociological Abstracts. Three investigators independently screened studies against predetermined criteria and assessed risk of bias. The picture of genetic privacy that emerges from this systematic literature review is complex and riddled with gaps. When asked specifically "are you worried about genetic privacy," the general public, patients, and professionals frequently said yes. In many cases, however, that question was posed poorly or only in the most general terms. While many participants expressed concern that genomic and medical information would be revealed to others, respondents frequently seemed to conflate privacy, confidentiality, control, and security. People varied widely in how much control they wanted over the use of data. They were more concerned about use by employers, insurers, and the government than they were about researchers and commercial entities. In addition, people are often willing to give up some privacy to obtain other goods. Importantly, little attention was paid to understanding the factors-sociocultural, relational, and media-that influence people's opinions and decisions. Future investigations should explore in greater depth which concerns about genetic privacy are most salient to people and the social forces and contexts that influence those perceptions. It is also critical to identify the social practices that will make the collection and use of these data more trustworthy for participants as well as to identify the circumstances that lead people to set aside worries and decide to participate in research.

Indexed as

Genetic PrivacyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30379944
PMCPMC6209148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.