Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The ties that bind: Cradling in Tajikistan.

Lana B Karasik, Catherine S Tamis-LeMonda, Ori Ossmy, Karen E Adolph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The mountain stream of infant development.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2023
    Article
  11. Equifinality in infancy: The many paths to walking.Developmental psychobiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lana B KarasikDepartment of Psychology, College of Staten Island & Graduate Center, CUNY, Staten Island, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0764-4557
Catherine S Tamis-LeMondaDepartment of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Ori OssmyDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Karen E AdolphDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

Flexibility of Learning in Infant Skill AcquisitionR37HD033486 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2006 to 2015
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD033486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A traditional childrearing practice-"gahvora" cradling-in Tajikistan and other parts of Central Asia purportedly restricts movement of infants' body and limbs. However, the practice has been documented only informally in anecdotal reports. Thus, this study had two research questions: (1) To what extent are infants' movements restricted in the gahvora? (2) How is time in the gahvora distributed over a 24-hour day in infants from 1-24 months of age? To answer these questions, we video-recorded 146 mothers cradling their infants and interviewed them using 24-hour time diaries to determine the distribution of time infants spent in the gahvora within a day and across age. Infants' movements were indeed severely restricted. Although mothers showed striking uniformity in how they restricted infants' movements, they showed large individual differences in amount and distribution of daily use. Machine learning algorithms yielded three patterns of use: day and nighttime cradling, mostly nighttime cradling, and mostly daytime cradling, suggesting multiple functions of the cradling practice. Across age, time in the gahvora decreased, yet 20% of 12- to 24-month-olds spent more than 15 hours bound in the gahvora. We discuss the challenges and benefits of cultural research, and how the discovery of new phenomena may defy Western assumptions about childrearing and development. Future work will determine whether the extent and timing of restriction impacts infants' physical and psychological development.

Indexed as

Child RearingInfant EquipmentAge FactorsChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInterviews as TopicMachine LearningMaleMaternal BehaviorMother-Child RelationsMothersPhotoperiodRestraint, PhysicalTajikistan

Identifiers

PMID30379916
PMCPMC6209138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.