ArticlePloS one2018
Genetic association study of dyslexia and ADHD candidate genes in a Spanish cohort: Implications of comorbid samples.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic neurodevelopmental clustering and dyslexia.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Genetic Variants Linked to Dyslexia Co-Morbid ADHD: A Case Study of a Pakistani Outpatient.Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique · 2024Article
- Compensation between FOXP transcription factors maintains proper striatal function.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Associative gene networks reveal novel candidates important for ADHD and dyslexia comorbidity.BMC medical genomics · 2023Article
- Compensation between FOXP transcription factors maintains proper striatal function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Can biomarkers be used to diagnose attention deficit hyperactivity disorder?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Review
- Seeking Overlapping Neuroanatomical Alterations between Dyslexia and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Meta-Analytic Replication Study.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Association between 19-bp Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism of Dopamine β-Hydroxylase and Autism Spectrum Disorder in Thai Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- The Polygenic Nature and Complex Genetic Architecture of Specific Learning Disorder.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Identification of Phonology-Related Genes and Functional Characterization of Broca's and Wernicke's Regions in Language and Learning Disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Emotional stability is associated with the MAOA promoter uVNTR polymorphism in women.Brain and behavior · 2019Article
- Genome-wide association scan identifies new variants associated with a cognitive predictor of dyslexia.Translational psychiatry · 2019Article
- The effectiveness of an intervention program -barton intervention program- on reading fluency of Iranian students with dyslexia.Journal of education and health promotion · 2019Article
- Correction: Genetic association study of dyslexia and ADHD candidate genes in a Spanish cohort: Implications of comorbid samples.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dyslexia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are two complex neuro-behaviorally disorders that co-occur more often than expected, so that reading disability has been linked to inattention symptoms. We examined 4 SNPs located on genes previously associated to dyslexia (KIAA0319, DCDC2, DYX1C1 and FOXP2) and 3 SNPs within genes related to ADHD (COMT, MAOA and DBH) in a cohort of Spanish children (N = 2078) that met the criteria of having one, both or none of these disorders (dyslexia and ADHD). We used a case-control approach comparing different groups of samples based on each individual diagnosis. In addition, we also performed a quantitative trait analysis with psychometric measures on the general population (N = 3357). The results indicated that the significance values for some markers change depending on the phenotypic groups compared and/or when considering pair-wise marker interactions. Furthermore, our quantitative trait study showed significant genetic associations with specific cognitive processes. These outcomes advocate the importance of establishing rigorous and homogeneous criteria for the diagnosis of cognitive disorders, as well as the relevance of considering cognitive endophenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.