Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379838›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

CytoBinning: Immunological insights from multi-dimensional data.

Yang Shen, Benjamin Chaigne-Delalande, Richard W J Lee, Wolfgang Losert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang ShenInstitute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4432-2995
Benjamin Chaigne-DelalandeLaboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Richard W J LeeTranslational Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Wolfgang LosertInstitute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New cytometric techniques continue to push the boundaries of multi-parameter quantitative data acquisition at the single-cell level particularly in immunology and medicine. Sophisticated analysis methods for such ever higher dimensional datasets are rapidly emerging, with advanced data representations and dimensional reduction approaches. However, these are not yet standardized and clinical scientists and cell biologists are not yet experienced in their interpretation. More fundamentally their range of statistical validity is not yet fully established. We therefore propose a new method for the automated and unbiased analysis of high-dimensional single cell datasets that is simple and robust, with the goal of reducing this complex information into a familiar 2D scatter plot representation that is of immediate utility to a range of biomedical and clinical settings. Using publicly available flow cytometry and mass cytometry datasets we demonstrate that this method (termed CytoBinning), recapitulates the results of traditional manual cytometric analyses and leads to new and testable hypotheses.

Indexed as

AgingBiomarkersCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8 AntigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDatasets as TopicFemaleFlow CytometryGene ExpressionHumansImage CytometryImmunity, InnateMalePattern Recognition, AutomatedReceptors, CCR7Single-Cell AnalysisBiomarkersCCR7 protein, humanCD8 AntigensReceptors, CCR7

Identifiers

PMID30379838
PMCPMC6209166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.