Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379668›Full record

Observational studyCritical care medicine2019

Spontaneous Breathing in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Insights From the Large Observational Study to UNderstand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory FailurE Study.

Frank van Haren, Tài Pham, Laurent Brochard, Giacomo Bellani, John Laffey, Martin Dres, Eddy Fan, Ewan C Goligher, Leo Heunks, Joan Lynch and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06195475 (Impact of Tidal Volume Magnitude in Pressure Support Mode on Mortality in Adults Under Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Multi-center Retrospective Cohort Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06195475 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Tidal Volume Magnitude in Pressure Support Mode on Mortality in Adults Under Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. Multi-center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSanatorio Anchorena San MartinRan2023 to 2024Enrolled2,607ConditionsRespiration, ArtificialArmshigh vs low tidal volume
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Frank van Haren
Tài Pham
Laurent BrochardKeenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Giacomo BellaniSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
John LaffeyDepartments of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Martin DresKeenan Centre for Biomedical Research, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eddy FanDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ewan C GoligherDivision of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Leo HeunksDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joan LynchICU, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hermann WriggeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Danny McAuleyCentre for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Large observational study to UNderstand the Global impact of Severe Acute respiratory FailurE (LUNG SAFE) Investigators

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome with or without spontaneous breathing and to investigate whether the effects of spontaneous breathing on outcome depend on acute respiratory distress syndrome severity.

designPlanned secondary analysis of a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study.

settingInternational sample of 459 ICUs from 50 countries. PATIENTS: Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and at least 2 days of invasive mechanical ventilation and available data for the mode of mechanical ventilation and respiratory rate for the 2 first days.

interventionsAnalysis of patients with and without spontaneous breathing, defined by the mode of mechanical ventilation and by actual respiratory rate compared with set respiratory rate during the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsSpontaneous breathing was present in 67% of patients with mild acute respiratory distress syndrome, 58% of patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 46% of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients with spontaneous breathing were older and had lower acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, ICU and hospital mortality, and were less likely to be diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome by clinicians. In adjusted analysis, spontaneous breathing during the first 2 days was not associated with an effect on ICU or hospital mortality (33% vs 37%; odds ratio, 1.18 [0.92-1.51]; p = 0.19 and 37% vs 41%; odds ratio, 1.18 [0.93-1.50]; p = 0.196, respectively ). Spontaneous breathing was associated with increased ventilator-free days (13 [0-22] vs 8 [0-20]; p = 0.014) and shorter duration of ICU stay (11 [6-20] vs 12 [7-22]; p = 0.04).

conclusionsSpontaneous breathing is common in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome during the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. Spontaneous breathing is not associated with worse outcomes and may hasten liberation from the ventilator and from ICU. Although these results support the use of spontaneous breathing in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome independent of acute respiratory distress syndrome severity, the use of controlled ventilation indicates a bias toward use in patients with higher disease severity. In addition, because the lack of reliable data on inspiratory effort in our study, prospective studies incorporating the magnitude of inspiratory effort and adjusting for all potential severity confounders are required.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory RateTidal WavesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30379668
PMCPMC6336491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.