Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379569›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2019

Marker-based watershed transform method for fully automatic mandibular segmentation from CBCT images.

Yi Fan, Richard Beare, Harold Matthews, Paul Schneider, Nicky Kilpatrick, John Clement, Peter Claes, Anthony Penington, Christopher Adamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Automatic pelvic bone segmentation for radiotherapy using diagnostic imaging workstation.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Automatic Segmentation of Mandibular Ramus and Condyles.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi Fan1 Department of Dentistry, The University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.
Richard Beare3 Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.
Harold Matthews2 Facial Sciences , Murdoch Children's Research Institute, VIC , Australia.
Paul Schneider1 Department of Dentistry, The University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.
Nicky Kilpatrick2 Facial Sciences , Murdoch Children's Research Institute, VIC , Australia.
John Clement1 Department of Dentistry, The University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.
Peter Claes2 Facial Sciences , Murdoch Children's Research Institute, VIC , Australia.
Anthony Penington2 Facial Sciences , Murdoch Children's Research Institute, VIC , Australia.
Christopher Adamson3 Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute , Melbourne, VIC , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives: To propose a reliable and practical method for automatically segmenting the mandible from CBCT images.

methods: The marker-based watershed transform is a region-growing approach that dilates or "floods" predefined markers onto a height map whose ridges denote object boundaries. We applied this method to segment the mandible from the rest of the CBCT image. The height map was generated to enhance the sharp decreases of intensity at the mandible/tissue border and suppress noise by computing the intensity gradient image of the CBCT itself. Two sets of markers, "mandible" and "background" were automatically placed inside and outside the mandible, respectively in a novel image using image registration. The watershed transform flooded the gradient image by dilating the markers simultaneously until colliding at watershed lines, estimating the mandible boundary. CBCT images of 20 adolescent subjects were chosen as test cases. Segmentation accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by measuring overlap (Dice similarity coefficient) and boundary agreement against a well-accepted interactive segmentation method described in the literature.

results: The Dice similarity coefficient was 0.97 ± 0.01 (mean ± SD), indicating almost complete overlap between the automatically and the interactively segmented mandibles. Boundary deviations were predominantly under 1 mm for most of the mandibular surfaces. The errors were mostly from bones around partially erupted wisdom teeth, the condyles and the dental enamels, which had minimal impact on the overall morphology of the mandible.

conclusions: The marker-based watershed transform method produces segmentation accuracy comparable to the well-accepted interactive segmentation approach.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyMandibleSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAdolescentAlgorithmsAnimalsBiomarkersCatsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMolar, ThirdBiomarkersCBCTimage registrationimage segmentationmandiblemarker-based watershed transform

Identifiers

PMID30379569
PMCPMC6476380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.