Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379198›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2018

Validation of the Dual-path Platform chromatographic immunoassay (DPP® CVL rapid test) for the serodiagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Fabiano Borges Figueiredo, Tassia Cristina Bello de Vasconcelos, Maria de Fátima Madeira, Rodrigo Caldas Menezes, Ana Nilce Silveira Maia-Elkhoury, Andreza Pain Marcelino, Guilherme L Werneck

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of SensPERT®Veterinary world · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Serosurvey of anti-Veterinary world · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabiano Borges FigueiredoFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Carlos Chagas, Laboratório de Biologia Celular, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Tassia Cristina Bello de VasconcelosPrefeitura Municipal de Resende, Vigilância em Saúde, Centro de Controle de Zoonoses, Resende, RJ, Brasil.
Maria de Fátima MadeiraFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Nacional de Infectologia, Laboratório de Vigilância em Leishmanioses, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Rodrigo Caldas MenezesFundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Nacional de infectologia, Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em Dermatozoonoses em Animais Domésticos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Ana Nilce Silveira Maia-ElkhouryOrganização Pan-Americana de Saúde, Doenças Negligenciadas, Tropicais e Transmitidas por Vetores, Doenças Transmissíveis e Determinantes Ambientais de Saúde, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brasil.
Andreza Pain MarcelinoFundação Ezequiel Dias, Instituto Otávio Magalhães, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Guilherme L WerneckUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Medicina Social, Departamento de Epidemiologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRDepartamento de Epidemiología · GTEzequiel Dias Foundation · BRPan American Health Organization (Brasil) · BRPrefeitura Municipal de Vitória · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Visceral leishmaniasis is a major public health challenge in South America, and dogs are its main urban reservoir. OBJECTIVE Validation of the canine Dual-path Platform immunoassay for canine visceral leishmaniasis (DPP® CVL) for a sample set composed of 1446 dogs from different Brazilian endemic areas. METHODS A well-defined reference standard by means of parasitological culture, immunohistochemistry, and histopathology was used. Animals were classified as asymptomatic, oligosymptomatic, or symptomatic. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed as a single set and in clinical groups. A reproducibility assessment of the tests was conducted using the Kappa (κ) index at three different laboratories (A, B, and C). FINDINGS Overall, 89% sensitivity and 70% specificity were obtained for the entire sample set. Analysis of the clinical groups showed a gradual decrease in the sensitivity and an increase in the specificity with the reduction of clinical signs in the dogs that were assessed, reaching a sensitivity of 75% (42.8-94.5%) among asymptomatic dogs and lower specificity of 56% (46.2-66.3%) among symptomatic dogs. Inter-laboratory agreement was substantial (κAB= 0.778; κAC= 0.645; κCB= 0.711). MAIN CONCLUSIONS The test performance is somewhat dependent on canine symptomatology, but such influence was less evident than in previous studies. Favourable results for sensitivity and specificity can be obtained even in asymptomatic animals; however, caution is needed in these evaluations, and the results suggest that the immunochromatographic test may be further improved for better investigation in asymptomatic dogs. The results obtained confirm the usefulness of DPP® CVL for application in serological surveys.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanBrazilChromatography, AffinityDog DiseasesDogsEndemic DiseasesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayImmunohistochemistryLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID30379198
PMCPMC6216333
OpenAlexW2898592208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.