Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30379068›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2018

Facilitated Diffusion Mechanisms in DNA Base Excision Repair and Transcriptional Activation.

Alexandre Esadze, James T Stivers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic Structures and Fast Transition Kinetics of Oxidized G-Quadruplexes.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  9. Quantitative morphological analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandre EsadzeDepartment of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , 725 North Wolfe Street , WBSB 314, Baltimore , Maryland 21205 , United States.
James T StiversDepartment of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , 725 North Wolfe Street , WBSB 314, Baltimore , Maryland 21205 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2572-7807

Funding

Uracil Damage Recognition by Uracil DNA GlyocosylaseR01GM056834 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MD BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI STIVERS, JAMES T. · 1998 to 2021
$8.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM056834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preservation of the coding potential of the genome and highly regulated gene expression over the life span of a human are two fundamental requirements of life. These processes require the action of repair enzymes or transcription factors that efficiently recognize specific sites of DNA damage or transcriptional regulation within a restricted time frame of the cell cycle or metabolism. A failure of these systems to act results in accumulated mutations, metabolic dysfunction, and disease. Despite the multifactorial complexity of cellular DNA repair and transcriptional regulation, both processes share a fundamental physical requirement that the proteins must rapidly diffuse to their specific DNA-binding sites that are embedded within the context of a vastly greater number of nonspecific DNA-binding sites. Superimposed on the needle-in-the-haystack problem is the complex nature of the cellular environment, which contains such high concentrations of macromolecules that the time frame for diffusion is expected to be severely extended as compared to dilute solution. Here we critically review the mechanisms for how these proteins solve the needle-in-the-haystack problem and how the effects of cellular macromolecular crowding can enhance facilitated diffusion processes. We restrict the review to human proteins that use stochastic, thermally driven site-recognition mechanisms, and we specifically exclude systems involving energy cofactors or circular DNA clamps. Our scope includes ensemble and single-molecule studies of the past decade or so, with an emphasis on connecting experimental observations to biological function.

Indexed as

DiffusionDNA RepairTranscriptional ActivationDNAHumansDNA

Identifiers

PMID30379068
PMCPMC6504930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.