Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30378521›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2019

Modifying the Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation (EPAO) to better capture feeding practices of family childcare home providers.

Alison Tovar, Amber E Vaughn, Jennifer Orlet Fisher, Sara E Benjamin Neelon, Regan Burney, Kathleen Webster, Tao Liu, Truls Ostbye, Dianne S Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Research on Non-Maternal Caregivers' Feeding of Children 0-3 Years.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. "A few more bites?": Manifestation of pressure-to-eat in child care.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. ResponsiveInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alison TovarDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI02881, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1559-592X
Amber E VaughnChildren's Healthy Weight Research Group, UNC Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jennifer Orlet FisherDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Obesity Research and Education, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sara E Benjamin NeelonJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Regan BurneyCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kathleen WebsterDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Tao LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Truls OstbyeCommunity and Family Medicine, Nursing and Global Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Dianne S WardDepartment of Nutrition, UNC Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

The Business of Childcare Homes & Child Health: Innovations for Nurturing GrowthR01HL108390 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI OSTBYE, TRULS, WARD, DIANNE STANTON · 2012 to 2016
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the modification and validation of an existing instrument, the Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation (EPAO), to better capture provider feeding practices.

designModifications to the EPAO were made, validity assessed through expert review, pilot tested and then used to collect follow-up data during a two-day home visit from an ongoing cluster-randomized trial. Exploratory factor analysis investigated the underlying factor structure of the feeding practices. To test predictive validity of the factors, multilevel mixed models examined associations between factors and child's diet quality as captured by the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) score (measured via the Dietary Observation in Childcare Protocol).

settingFamily childcare homes (FCCH) in Rhode Island and North Carolina, USA.ParticipantsThe modified EPAO was pilot tested with fifty-three FCCH and then used to collect data in 133 FCCH.

resultsThe final three-factor solution ('coercive control and indulgent feeding practices', 'autonomy support practices', 'negative role modelling') captured 43 % of total variance. In multilevel mixed models adjusted for covariates, 'autonomy support practices' was positively associated with children's diet quality. A 1-unit increase in the use of 'autonomy support practices' was associated with a 9·4-unit increase in child HEI-2010 score (P=0·001).

conclusionsSimilar to the parenting literature, constructs which describe coercive controlling practices and those which describe autonomy-supportive practices emerged. Given that diets of pre-schoolers in the USA remain suboptimal, teaching childcare providers about supportive feeding practices may help improve children's diet quality.

Indexed as

Child Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolDiet, HealthyFactor Analysis, StatisticalFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMultilevel AnalysisNorth CarolinaNutrition SurveysPilot ProjectsProcess Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsRhode IslandChildcare providerFeeding practicesObservational tool

Identifiers

PMID30378521
PMCPMC6365011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.