Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30378256›Full record

Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2019

A phase II study of eribulin in recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Michael S Isakoff, Robert Goldsby, Doojduen Villaluna, Mark D Krailo, Pooja Hingorani, Anderson Collier, Carol D Morris, E Anders Kolb, John J Doski, Richard B Womer and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biological Sample Collection to Advance Research and Treatment: A Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research and Euro Ewing Consortium Statement.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Advancing therapy for osteosarcoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Relapsed Osteosarcoma Trial Concepts to Match the Complexity of the Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Michael S IsakoffCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-4790-9919
Robert GoldsbyDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, California.
Doojduen VillalunaChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, California.
Mark D KrailoChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, California.
Pooja HingoraniCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona.
Anderson CollierHematology/Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Carol D MorrisDivision of Orthopaedic Oncology, John Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-4007-9476
E Anders KolbAlfred I DuPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware.
John J DoskiDepartment of Surgery/Pediatric Surgery Division, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Rosa Children's Hospital, San Antonio, Texas.
Richard B WomerDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Richard GorlickDivision of Pediatrics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Katherine A JanewayDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-3594
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Oncology Group · USConnecticut Children's Medical Center · USDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center · USDuPont (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NIH HHS U10CA098543NIH HHS U10CA180886NIH HHS U10CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma have a poor prognosis with less than 30% surviving two years. Eribulin is a synthetic analog of halichondrin B, has a novel mechanism of action when compared with other microtubule inhibitors, and may have antitumor activity in osteosarcoma.

methodsA prospective study was designed to assess the disease control success at four months and objective response rates in patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma treated with eribulin. Eligible patients were between 12 and 50 years of age, had measurable tumor, and met standard organ function requirements. Patients were given eribulin 1.4 mg/m

resultsNineteen patients enrolled on the AOST1322 study. The median age of enrollment was 16 years (range, 12-25 years). Twelve patients were male and seven female. Eribulin was well tolerated, with neutropenia identified as the most common toxicity. The median progression-free survival was 38 days and no patients reached the four-month time point without progression. No objective responses were seen in any patient.

conclusionThis study rapidly assessed the clinical activity of a novel agent in this patient population. Eribulin was well tolerated, but there were no patients who demonstrated objective response, and all patients had progression prior to four months.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBone NeoplasmsChildDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOsteosarcomaPolyether PolyketidesProgression-Free SurvivalTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentseribulinFuransKetonesPolyether Polyketideseribulinosteosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID30378256
PMCPMC6501793
OpenAlexW2899477358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.