Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30378084›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2019

Neural correlates of goal-directed enhancement and suppression of visual stimuli in the absence of conscious perception.

Susan L Travis, Paul E Dux, Jason B Mattingley

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Susan L TravisQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia. s.travis@uq.edu.au.
Paul E DuxSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia.
Jason B MattingleyQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council FT120100033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An observer's current goals can influence the processing of visual stimuli. Such influences can work to enhance goal-relevant stimuli and suppress goal-irrelevant stimuli. Here, we combined behavioral testing and electroencephalography (EEG) to examine whether such enhancement and suppression effects arise even when the stimuli are masked from awareness. We used a feature-based spatial cueing paradigm, in which participants searched four-item arrays for a target in a specific color. Immediately before the target array, a nonpredictive cue display was presented in which a cue matched or mismatched the searched-for target color, and appeared either at the target location (spatially valid) or another location (spatially invalid). Cue displays were masked using continuous flash suppression. The EEG data revealed that target-colored cues produced robust N2pc and N

Indexed as

AwarenessConsciousnessGoalsVisual PerceptionAdultCuesElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePerceptual MaskingPhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionTask Performance and AnalysisYoung AdultAttentional captureAttention: SelectiveVisual awareness

Identifiers

PMID30378084
PMCPMC6647410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.