ReviewDer Pathologe2018
[Clonal evolution of early lymphoproliferations].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification and molecular characterisation of premalignant precursor lesions of lymphomas, such as monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) and the so-called in situ lymphoproliferations, has made significant progress in the recent years. The in situ follicular neoplasia (ISFN), the best-characterised entity, is by definition not identifiable by morphology and represents a t(14;18)+ precursor lesion of follicular lymphoma with characteristic immunophenotype, low potential for progression, and already identifiable secondary genetic alterations. The use of high-throughput genetic techniques on microdissected tissues has generated novel insights into clonal evolution and biological progression of early lesions and documented that an isolated genetic analysis is insufficient to understand the complexity of proliferations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30377786What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.