Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30377782›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2019

Comparison of data science workflows for root cause analysis of bioprocesses.

Daniel Borchert, Diego A Suarez-Zuluaga, Patrick Sagmeister, Yvonne E Thomassen, Christoph Herwig

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel BorchertExputec GmbH, Mariahilferstraße 147/2/2D, 1150, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0067-7965
Diego A Suarez-ZuluagaIntravacc, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Patrick SagmeisterExputec GmbH, Mariahilferstraße 147/2/2D, 1150, Vienna, Austria.
Yvonne E ThomassenIntravacc, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Christoph HerwigExputec GmbH, Mariahilferstraße 147/2/2D, 1150, Vienna, Austria. christoph.herwig@tuwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root cause analysis (RCA) is one of the most prominent tools used to comprehensively evaluate a biopharmaceutical production process. Despite of its widespread use in industry, the Food and Drug Administration has observed a lot of unsuitable approaches for RCAs within the last years. The reasons for those unsuitable approaches are the use of incorrect variables during the analysis and the lack in process understanding, which impede correct model interpretation. Two major approaches to perform RCAs are currently dominating the chemical and pharmaceutical industry: raw data analysis and feature-based approach. Both techniques are shown to be able to identify the significant variables causing the variance of the response. Although they are different in data unfolding, the same tools as principal component analysis and partial least square regression are used in both concepts. Within this article we demonstrate the strength and weaknesses of both approaches. We proved that a fusion of both results in a comprehensive and effective workflow, which not only increases better process understanding. We demonstrate this workflow along with an example. Hence, the presented workflow allows to save analysis time and to reduce the effort of data mining by easy detection of the most important variables within the given dataset. Subsequently, the final obtained process knowledge can be translated into new hypotheses, which can be tested experimentally and thereby lead to effectively improving process robustness.

Indexed as

Root Cause AnalysisWorkflowAnimalsBioreactorsChlorocebus aethiopsData ScienceDrug IndustryFermentationMultivariate AnalysisPoliovirusPrincipal Component AnalysisRegression AnalysisSoftwareVero CellsData analysisData scienceFeature based analysisRaw data analysisRoot cause analysis

Identifiers

PMID30377782
PMCPMC6514075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.