Treatment of ischemic stroke beyond 3 hours: is time really brain?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Automated advanced imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Certainties and uncertainties.European journal of radiology open · 2023
   Article
2. Duration of Ischemia Affects Outcomes Independent of Infarct Size in Stroke.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022
   Article
3. Comparison of 2D simultaneous multi-slice and 3D GRASE readout schemes for pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling of cerebral perfusion at 3 T.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
   Article
4. Is time brain in recanalization therapies of stroke?Brain circulation
   Article
5. Current status of acute ischemic stroke management in Iran: Findings from a single-center study.Turkish journal of emergency medicine
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as