Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30377706›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2018

[Current diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections].

Dr C Hein, F M E Wagenlehner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dr C HeinKlinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Andrologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland.
F M E WagenlehnerKlinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Andrologie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Str. 7, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. florian.wagenlehner@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de.
University of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, there has been an increasing incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI), which in turn play a major role in urological clinical routine.

objectivesWhich STIs are relevant in urological clinical routine? What kind of recommendations for diagnosis and treatment exist? MATERIALS AND

methodsReview of evidence-based recommendations from the literature, current guidelines of the European Association of Urology and the Robert-Koch-Institute.

resultsSTIs can be differentiated into those that cause genital, anal, perianal or oral ulcers from STIs that cause urethritis, cervicitis, or urethral or vaginal discharge. Asymptomatic courses are frequently observed. For diagnosis predominantly amplification methods are recommended. The local resistance situation should be considered. Special attention is paid to the worldwide increasing resistance of gonococci. The sexual partner should also be treated. In addition, diagnosis and therapy of other STIs should be made due to the high rate of co-infection.

conclusionsDue to the increasing incidence of STIs, the recognition and evidence-based treatment of these infections is essential to avoid ascending infections, long-term consequences, and further transmissions. It is important to assure the infectious material before initiating therapy to be able to switch from the initially initiated calculated therapy (also considering the local resistance situation) to a test-appropriate therapy.

Indexed as

Sexually Transmitted DiseasesUrethritisFemaleHumansAmplification technics, nucleic acidGonococcusHerpes genitalisResistanceUlcer

Identifiers

PMID30377706
OpenAlexW2898944090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.