ArticleGlobal health research and policy2018
A bibliometric analysis of global research output on health and human rights (1900-2017).
Article in Global health research and policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge mapping and research trends in degenerative mitral regurgitation: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Swimming-related shoulder injuries: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Article
- Global research trends and mapping knowledge structure of depression in dialysis patients.World journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Research landscape on COVID-19 and liver dysfunction: A bibliometric analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Research Trends and Geographical Contribution in the Field of Perinatal Mental Health: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1900 to 2020.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Trends in hepatitis A research indexed in the Web of Science: a bibliometric analysis over the period from 1985 to 2019.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- A Bibliometric Meta-Analysis of Colistin Resistance inDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Thirty Years of Human Rights Study in the Web of Science Database (1990-2020).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Iranian researchers' contributions to research on COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis and visualization.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021Article
- A bibliometric analysis of human strongyloidiasis research (1968 to 2017).Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBaseline data on global research activity on health and human rights (HHR) needs to be assessed and analyzed to identify research gaps and to prioritize funding and research agendas. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the growth of publications and research pattern on HHR.
methodsA bibliometric methodology was used. Literature on HHR was retrieved using SciVerse Scopus for the study period from 1900 to 2017. Nine different search scenarios with different keyword combinations were used to retrieve the required documents. All types of documents published in peer-reviewed journals, including editorials, were included. The search strategy was validated.
resultsIn total 6513 documents were retrieved with an
conclusionsDifferential research productivity on HHR was seen among scholars in different world regions. World countries need to encourage and strengthen research on HHR in order to achieve the goals set in international agreements of human rights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.