ArticleAJP reports2018
Clinical Insights for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Prostaglandins.
Article in AJP reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05834361 (The Administration Time Point of Carboprost Methylate and Effects on Perioperative Complications and Cervical Ripening Effect in Artificial Abortion), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Administration Time Point of Carboprost Methylate and Effects on Perioperative Complications and Cervical Ripening Effect in Artificial Abortion
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- The use of misoprostol before hysteroscopy in Nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- The Role of Papaverine in the Molecular and Biomechanical Mechanisms of Cervical Ripening: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Association between maternal BMI and success of labor induction with oral misoprostol: a cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Timing of Prostin E2 Administration After Poor Response to Propess: Impact on Induction-to-Birth Interval and Maternal/Neonatal Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Safety of the use of dinoprostone gel and vaginal insert for induction of labor: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Observational
- Effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of the dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening in patients with an unfavorable bishop score.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Observational
- Linking DNA damage and senescence to gestation period and lifespan in placental mammals.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Results of Induction of Labor with Prostaglandins E1 and E2 (The RIPE Study): A Real-World Data Analysis of Obstetrical Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacological Induction of Labor with Vaginal Inserts.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Assessing the risk factors and management outcomes of ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective case-control study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2023Article
- The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Intravaginal Isoniazid (INH) and Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Sublingual Misoprostol Alone for First-Trimester Induced Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2023Article
- Perinatal outcome and risk factors of precipitate labor in term primipara: an analysis of 381 cases.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Vaginal Nanoformulations for the Management of Preterm Birth.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Application of Sol-Gels for Treatment of Gynaecological Conditions-Physiological Perspectives and Emerging Concepts in Intravaginal Drug Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- PPDTS: Predicting potential drug-target interactions based on network similarity.IET systems biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical ripening is often the first component of labor induction and is used to facilitate the softening and thinning of the cervix in preparation for labor. Common methods used for cervical ripening include both mechanical (e.g., Foley or Cook catheters) and pharmacologic (e.g., prostaglandins) methods. The choice of method(s) for ripening should take into account the patient's medical and obstetric history, clinical characteristics, and risk of adverse effects if uterine tachysystole were to occur. In this narrative review, we highlight the differences between the prostaglandins dinoprostone and misoprostol with respect to pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and potential safety concerns. Practical guidance on choosing an appropriate prostaglandin agent for cervical ripening and labor induction is provided via the use of clinical vignettes. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of each preparation allows clinicians to individualize treatment, depending on the indications for induction and unique characteristics of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.