Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30377390›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology2018

Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Takeshi Namekawa, Takashi Imamoto, Mayuko Kato, Akira Komiya, Tomohiko Ichikawa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. [Vasectomy reversal : Literature review].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Vasectomy reversal: lessons learned to optimize clinical outcomes.International journal of impotence research · 2026
    Review
  9. Translational andrology and urology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Case - Vas deferens injury after herniorrhaphy leading to epididymal blowout in a pediatric patient.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Male factor infertility: Initial workup and diagnosis in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeshi NamekawaDepartment of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University Chiba Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0054-0985
Takashi ImamotoDepartment of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University Chiba Japan.
Mayuko KatoDepartment of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University Chiba Japan.
Akira KomiyaDepartment of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University Chiba Japan.
Tomohiko IchikawaDepartment of Urology Graduate School of Medicine Chiba University Chiba Japan.
Chiba University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of improving assisted reproductive technology (ART), patients with obstructive azoospermia (OA) have 2 options: vasal repair or testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Vasal repair, including vasovasostomy (VV) and vasoepididymostomy (VE), is the only option that leads to natural conception.

methodsThis article reviews the surgical techniques, outcomes, and predictors of postoperative patency and pregnancy, with a focus on articles that have reported over the last 10 years, using PubMed database searches. MAIN

findingsThe reported mean patency rate was 87% and the mean pregnancy rate was 49% for a patient following microscopic VV and/or VE for vasectomy reversal. Recently, robot-assisted techniques were introduced and have achieved a high rate of success. The predictors and predictive models of postoperative patency and pregnancy also have been reported. The obstructive interval, presence of a granuloma, and intraoperative sperm findings predict postoperative patency. These factors also predict postoperative fertility. In addition, the female partner's age and the same female partner correlate with pregnancy after surgery.

conclusionIn the era of ART, the physician should present and discuss with both the patient with OA and his partner the most appropriate procedure to conceive by using these predictors.

Indexed as

male infertilityobstructive azoospermiavasectomy reversalvasoepididymostomyvasovasostomy

Identifiers

PMID30377390
PMCPMC6194271
OpenAlexW2804318287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.