Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30377243›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2020

Evidence of compensation among waterpipe smokers using harm reduction components.

Marielle C Brinkman, Hyoshin Kim, Stephanie S Buehler, Anna M Adetona, Sydney M Gordon, Pamela I Clark

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Toxicity of waterpipe tobacco smoking: the role of flavors, sweeteners, humectants, and charcoal.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Perceived Harms of Waterpipe Tobacco Heating Sources Among Young Adult Waterpipe Tobacco Smokers.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemical Characterization of Nanoparticles and Volatiles Present in Mainstream Hookah Smoke.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marielle C BrinkmanCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Hyoshin KimBattelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephanie S BuehlerBattelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Anna M AdetonaBattelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sydney M GordonBattelle Public Health Center for Tobacco Research, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Pamela I ClarkSchool of Public Health, Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Battelle · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Rapid Response Characterization of New and Manipulated Tobacco ProductsP50CA180523 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CLARK, PAMELA I · 2013 to 2017
$19.0M
Standardization of Methods to Measure Waterpipie Smoke Emissions and ExposureR01CA133149 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CLARK, PAMELA I · 2009 to 2012
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180523NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe examined two waterpipe tobacco smoking components advertised to reduce harm to determine if they result in lower levels of biomarkers of acute exposure.

methodsWe conducted a crossover study of 34 experienced waterpipe smokers smoking a research-grade waterpipe in three configurations

resultsSmokers' mean plasma nicotine, heart rate, and exhaled benzene and CO boost were all significantly lower for electric compared with control. However, smokers puffed more intensely and took significantly more and larger volume puffs for a larger total puffing volume (2.0 times larger, p<0.0001) when smoking electric; machine yields indicate this was likely due to lower mainstream nicotine. Smokers rated electric smoking experience less satisfying and less pleasant. For charcoal heating, the mean mass of CO emitted into the chamber was ~1 g when participants smoked for a mean of 32 minutes at a typical residential ventilation rate (2.3 hr

conclusionWaterpipe smokers engaged in compensation (i.e., increased and more intense puffing) to make up for decreased mainstream nicotine delivery from the same tobacco heated two ways. Waterpipe components can affect human puffing behaviours, exposures and subjective effects. Evidence reported here supports regulation of waterpipe components, smoking bans in multifamily housing and the use of human studies to evaluate modified or reduced risk claims.

Indexed as

Tobacco, WaterpipeWater Pipe SmokingAdultBenzeneBiomarkersBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideCross-Over StudiesFemaleHarm ReductionHeart RateHumansInhalation ExposureMaleNicotineSmokersBenzeneBiomarkersCarbon MonoxideNicotineTobacco Smoke Pollutionaddictioncarcinogensglobal healthnicotinesecondhand smoke

Identifiers

PMID30377243
PMCPMC7350613
OpenAlexW2899382061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.