Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30377139›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

The Use of Web-Based Technologies in Health Research Participation: Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences.

Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang, Shanton Chang, Karin Verspoor, Ornella Clavisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Engagement of Government Social Media on Facebook during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Macao.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick Cheong-Iao PangSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8820-5443
Shanton ChangSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-3910
Karin VerspoorSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8661-1544
Ornella ClavisiMusculoskeletal Australia, Elsternwick, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6069-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth consumers are often targeted for their involvement in health research including randomized controlled trials, focus groups, interviews, and surveys. However, as reported by many studies, recruitment and engagement of consumers in academic research remains challenging. In addition, there is scarce literature describing what consumers look for and want to achieve by participating in research.

objectiveUnderstanding and responding to the needs of consumers is crucial to the success of health research projects. In this study, we aim to understand consumers' needs and investigate the opportunities for addressing these needs with Web-based technologies, particularly in the use of Web-based research registers and social networking sites (SNSs).

methodsWe undertook a qualitative approach, interviewing both consumer and medical researchers in this study. With the help from an Australian-based organization supporting people with musculoskeletal conditions, we successfully interviewed 23 consumers and 10 researchers. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed with thematic analysis methodology. Data collection was stopped after the data themes reached saturation.

resultsWe found that consumers perceive research as a learning opportunity and, therefore, expect high research transparency and regular updates. They also consider the sources of the information about research projects, the trust between consumers and researchers, and the mobility of consumers before participating in any research. Researchers need to be aware of such needs when designing a campaign for recruitment for their studies. On the other hand, researchers have attempted to establish a rapport with consumer participants, design research for consumers' needs, and use technologies to reach out to consumers. A systematic approach to integrating a variety of technologies is needed.

conclusionsOn the basis of the feedback from both consumers and researchers, we propose 3 future directions to use Web-based technologies for addressing consumers' needs and engaging with consumers in health research: (1) researchers can make use of consumer registers and Web-based research portals, (2) SNSs and new media should be frequently used as an aid, and (3) new technologies should be adopted to remotely collect data and reduce administrative work for obtaining consumers' consent.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultAgedCommunity ParticipationFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedOnline Social NetworkingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultconsumer behaviorpatient portalsregistriesresearch designresearch subjectssocial networking

Identifiers

PMID30377139
PMCPMC6234342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.