Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30376847›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Implementing universal Lynch syndrome screening (IMPULSS): protocol for a multi-site study to identify strategies to implement, adapt, and sustain genomic medicine programs in different organizational contexts.

Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Deborah Cragun, Jessica Ezzell Hunter, Mara M Epstein, Jan Lowery, Christine Y Lu, Pamala A Pawloski, Ravi N Sharaf, Su-Ying Liang, Andrea N Burnett-Hartman and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Alanna Kulchak RahmGeisinger Genomic Medicine Institute, 100 N. Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA. akrahm@geisinger.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-9298
Deborah CragunUniversity of South Florida, 3720 Spectrum Blvd, Suite 304, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Jessica Ezzell HunterCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97202, USA.
Mara M EpsteinDepartment of Medicine and the Meyers Primary Care Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 365 Plantation St. Biotech 1, Suite 100, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Jan LoweryColorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Christine Y LuDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, USA.
Pamala A PawloskiHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.
Ravi N SharafDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Su-Ying LiangPalo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, 795 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA.
Andrea N Burnett-HartmanKaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, 2550 S. Parker Rd., Ste 200, Aurora, CO, 80014, USA.
James M GudgeonIntermountain Healthcare, Precision Genomics, IMC campus, Bldg. 2, Suite 610, 5121 S. Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
Jing HaoGeisinger Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research 100 N, Academy Ave Danville, Mahoning Township, PA, 17822, USA.
Susan SnyderGeisinger Department of Epidemiology and Health Services Research 100 N, Academy Ave Danville, Mahoning Township, PA, 17822, USA.
Radhika GogoiGeisinger Genomic Medicine Institute, 100 N. Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Ilene LaddGeisinger Genomic Medicine Institute, 100 N. Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.
Marc S WilliamsGeisinger Genomic Medicine Institute, 100 N. Academy Ave, Danville, PA, 17822, USA.

Funding

Implementing Universal Lynch Syndrome Screening across Multiple Healthcare Systems: Identifying Strategies to Facilitate and Maintain Programs in Different Organizational ContextsR01CA211723 · NCI · GEISINGER CLINIC · PI RAHM, ALANNA K · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
National Cancer Institute R01CA211723NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematic screening of all colorectal tumors for Lynch Syndrome (LS) has been recommended since 2009. Currently, implementation of LS screening in healthcare systems remains variable, likely because LS screening involves the complex coordination of multiple departments and individuals across the healthcare system. Our specific aims are to (1) describe variation in LS screening implementation across multiple healthcare systems; (2) identify conditions associated with both practice variation and optimal implementation; (3) determine the relative effectiveness, efficiency, and costs of different LS screening protocols by healthcare system; and (4) develop and test in a real-world setting an organizational toolkit for LS screening program implementation and improvement. This toolkit will promote effective implementation of LS screening in various complex health systems.

methodsThis study includes eight healthcare systems with 22 clinical sites at varied stages of implementing LS screening programs. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we will conduct in-depth semi-structured interviews with patients and organizational stakeholders and perform economic evaluation of site-specific implementation costs. These processes will result in a comprehensive cross-case analysis of different organizational contexts. We will utilize qualitative data analysis and configurational comparative methodology to identify facilitators and barriers at the organizational level that are minimally sufficient and necessary for optimal LS screening implementation. DISCUSSION: The overarching goal of this project is to combine our data with theories and tools from implementation science to create an organizational toolkit to facilitate implementation of LS screening in various real-world settings. Our organizational toolkit will account for issues of complex coordination of care involving multiple stakeholders to enhance implementation, sustainability, and ongoing improvement of evidence-based LS screening programs. Successful implementation of such programs will ultimately reduce suffering of patients and their family members from preventable cancers, decrease waste in healthcare system costs, and inform strategies to facilitate the promise of precision medicine.

trial registrationN/A.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerGenomicsPrecision MedicineColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicResearch DesignColorectal CancerConfigurational comparative methodConsolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)Decision analytic modelingEconomic evaluationImplementationLynch syndromePrecision medicineQualitative comparative analysis (QCA)Universal screening

Identifiers

PMID30376847
PMCPMC6208012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.