Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30376830›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Participants' expectations and experiences with periodic health examinations in Austria - a qualitative study.

Isolde Sommer, Viktoria Titscher, Gerald Gartlehner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isolde SommerDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Continuing Education (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Austria. isolde.sommer@donau-uni.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3592-1507
Viktoria TitscherDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Continuing Education (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Austria.
Gerald GartlehnerDepartment for Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Continuing Education (Danube University Krems), Dr.-Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Austria.

Funding

Main Association of Austrian Social Security Institutions none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe engagement of citizens in the development of evidence-based screening programs is internationally supported. The aim of our research was to explore the motivations and reasons of adult citizens in Austria for attending periodic health examinations (PHE) as well as their satisfaction with the way PHE are organized.

methodsWe conducted three focus groups with a random sample of previous attenders of PHE. Participants were stratified by age, gender, and education. The discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

resultsMain motivations of attenders (n = 30) were to detect diseases early, to prevent suffering, and to live a long, healthy life. They believed that PHE work as an incentive of health behavior change. As possible reasons not to attend PHE, participants mentioned lack of awareness, time constraints, unpleasant prior experiences, and fear of harm or negative consequences. They wanted the range of examinations to be selected based on individual risks and to be more comprehensive. Some participants expressed frustration with the lack of time doctors dedicated to the examination or discussion of the results. Throughout the discussion, participants realized there is a great diversity among doctors in the quality of health examinations and how content is delivered.

conclusionThe study showed that attenders of PHE have high expectations concerning the beneficial outcomes of PHE. They requested a comprehensive and individualized program that does not reflect the scientific evidence from effectiveness studies of PHE. These findings indicate serious shortcomings in the communication of benefits and harms of screening interventions and highlight the need for a more proactive communication about aims and content of the program.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisHealth PromotionMotivationAdolescentAdultAgedAustriaCommunicationFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical ExaminationPhysiciansQualitative ResearchExpectationsFocus groupsHealth checkMotivationsPeriodic health examinationQualitative studySatisfactionScreening

Identifiers

PMID30376830
PMCPMC6208031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.