Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30376750›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Quality of Care and Outcomes for Patients With Stroke in the United States Admitted During the International Stroke Conference.

Steven R Messé, Michael T Mullen, Margueritte Cox, Gregg C Fonarow, Eric E Smith, Jeffrey L Saver, Mathew J Reeves, Deepak L Bhatt, Roland Matsouaka, Lee H Schwamm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Steven R Messé1 Department of Neurology Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Michael T Mullen1 Department of Neurology Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
Margueritte Cox2 Duke Clinical Research Center Durham NC.
Gregg C Fonarow3 Division of Cardiology University of California Los Angeles CA.
Eric E Smith4 Department of Clinical Neurosciences Hotchkiss Brain Institute University of Calgary Alberta Canada.
Jeffrey L Saver5 Department of Neurology and Stroke Center University of California Los Angeles CA.
Mathew J Reeves6 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Michigan State University East Lansing MI.
Deepak L Bhatt7 Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
Roland Matsouaka2 Duke Clinical Research Center Durham NC.
Lee H Schwamm8 Department of Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patients presenting to hospitals during non-weekday hours experience worse outcomes, often attributed to reduced staffing. The American Heart Association International Stroke Conference ( ISC ) is well attended by stroke clinicians. We sought to determine whether patients with acute ischemic stroke ( AIS ) admitted during the ISC receive less guideline-adherent care and experience worse outcomes. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of US hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke and assessed use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, other quality measures, and outcomes for patients with AIS admitted during the ISC compared with those admitted the weeks before and after the conference. A total of 69 738 patients with AIS were included: mean age, 72 years; 52% women; 29% nonwhite. There was no difference between the average weekly number of AIS cases admitted during ISC weeks versus non- ISC weeks (1984 versus 1997; P=0.95). Patient and hospital characteristics were similar between ISC and non- ISC time periods. There were no significant differences in 14 quality metrics and 5 clinical outcomes between patients with AIS treated during the ISC versus non- ISC weeks. Patients with AIS who presented within 2 hours of onset had no difference in the likelihood of receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator within 3 hours (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.03; P=0.13) or the likelihood of receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator within 60 minutes of arrival (adjusted odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.02; P=0.13). Conclusions Patients with acute stroke admitted to Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals during ISC received the same quality care and had similar outcomes as patients admitted at other times.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicQuality of Health CareAcute DiseaseAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsGuideline AdherenceHumansMalePatient AdmissionRetrospective StudiesStrokeTissue Plasminogen ActivatorTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen Activatorquality indicatorsstroke caretissue‐type plasminogen activator

Identifiers

PMID30376750
PMCPMC6404171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.