Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30376581›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2018

Health systems thinking: A new generation of research to improve healthcare quality.

Hannah H Leslie, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Tanya Marchant, Svetlana V Doubova, Oye Gureje, Margaret E Kruk

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah H LeslieDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7464-3645
Lisa R HirschhornDepartments of Medical Social Sciences and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4228-4334
Svetlana V DoubovaEpidemiology and Health Services Research Unit, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-7095
Oye GurejeWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neuroscience, Drug and Alcohol Abuse, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-0094-5947
Margaret E KrukDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9549-8432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hannah Leslie and colleagues of the High-Quality Health Commission discuss in an Editorial the findings from their report that detail the improvements needed to prevent declines in individuals' health as the scope and quality of health systems increase. Patient-centered care at the population level, improved utility of research products, and innovative reporting tools to help guide the development of new methods are key to improved global healthcare.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareSystems AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansTerminology as Topic

Identifiers

PMID30376581
PMCPMC6207294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.