Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30376303›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2018

Global and Local Impacts of Delayed Mercury Mitigation Efforts.

Hélène Angot, Nicholas Hoffman, Amanda Giang, Colin P Thackray, Ashley N Hendricks, Noel R Urban, Noelle E Selin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Unexpected anthropogenic emission decreases explain recent atmospheric mercury concentration declines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Evidence that Pacific tuna mercury levels are driven by marine methylmercury production and anthropogenic inputs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hélène AngotInstitute for Data, Systems, and Society , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-8249
Nicholas HoffmanDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.
Amanda GiangInstitute for Data, Systems, and Society , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.
Colin P ThackrayHarvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences , Harvard University , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02138 , United States.
Ashley N HendricksCivil and Environmental Engineering Department , Michigan Technological University , Houghton , Michigan 49931 , United States.
Noel R UrbanCivil and Environmental Engineering Department , Michigan Technological University , Houghton , Michigan 49931 , United States.
Noelle E SelinInstitute for Data, Systems, and Society , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , Massachusetts 02139 , United States.

Funding

TOXICOLOGY CORE UNITP30ES002109 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NILES, JACQUIN C · 1985 to 2020
$25.6M
The MIT Superfund Research Program: A Systems Approach for the Protection of Human Health from Hazardous ChemicalsP42ES027707 · NIEHS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JOHN M ESSIGMANN · 2017 to 2026
$22.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES002109NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) is emitted to air by natural and anthropogenic sources, transports and deposits globally, and bioaccumulates to toxic levels in food webs. It is addressed under the global 2017 Minamata Convention, for which periodic effectiveness evaluation is required. Previous analyses have estimated the impact of different regulatory strategies for future mercury deposition. However, analyses using atmospheric models traditionally hold legacy emissions (recycling of previously deposited Hg) constant, and do not account for their possible future growth. Here, using an integrated modeling approach, we investigate how delays in implementing emissions reductions and the associated growing legacy reservoir affect deposition fluxes to ecosystems in different global regions. Assuming nearly constant yearly emissions relative to 2010, each 5-year delay in peak emissions defers by additional extra ca. 4 years the return to year 2010 global deposition. On a global average, each 5-year delay leads to a 14% decrease in policy impacts on local-scale Hg deposition. We also investigate the response of fish contamination in remote lakes to delayed action. We quantify the consequences of delay for limiting the Hg burden of future generations and show that traditional analyses of policy impacts provide best-case estimates.

Indexed as

MercuryAnimalsEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringFishesLakesMercury

Identifiers

PMID30376303
PMCPMC6377800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.