Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30376041›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2019

Antimicrobial approaches in the prevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review.

D P R Troeman, D Van Hout, J A J W Kluytmans

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ERJ open research · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  4. New Insights intoAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Rebound Inverts theAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial Properties of Plant Fibers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. APTC-C-SA01: A Novel Bacteriophage Cocktail TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Novel antimicrobial bioplastic based on PLA-chitosan by addition of TiOJournal of environmental health science & engineering · 2021
    Article
  14. First report of methicillin-resistantNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D P R TroemanJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
D Van HoutJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J A J W KluytmansJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The prophylactic application of antimicrobials that are active against Staphylococcus aureus can prevent infections. However, implementation in clinical practice is limited. We have reviewed antimicrobial approaches for the prevention of S. aureus infections. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and trial registries using synonyms for S. aureus, infections and prevention as search terms. We included randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews only. Results: Most studies were conducted with mupirocin. Mupirocin is effective in preventing S. aureus infections in patients receiving dialysis treatment and in surgical patients, particularly if the patients are carriers of S. aureus. The combination of mupirocin and chlorhexidine, but not chlorhexidine alone, is also effective against S. aureus infections. So far, vaccines have not proven successful in protecting against S. aureus infections. Regarding prophylactic povidone-iodine and systemic antibiotics, there is limited evidence supporting their effectiveness against S. aureus infections. Antimicrobial honey has not been proven to be more effective or non-inferior to mupirocin in protecting against S. aureus infections. Conclusions: The current evidence supports the use of mupirocin as prophylaxis for preventing infections with S. aureus, particularly in carriers and in the surgical setting or in patients receiving dialysis treatment. Other antimicrobial agents have not been sufficiently proven to be effective so far, or have been proven ineffective. New trials with vaccines and anti-staphylococcal peptides are currently underway and may lead to new preventive strategies in the future.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCarrier StateHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMupirocinRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSystematic Reviews as TopicAnti-Infective AgentsMupirocin

Identifiers

PMID30376041
PMCPMC6337897
OpenAlexW2903998537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.