Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375906›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2018

Who should provide care for patients receiving palliative chemotherapy? A qualitative study among Dutch general practitioners and oncologists.

Jan Wind, Ineke C Nugteren, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Henk C P M van Weert, Inge Henselmans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nurses' Insights and Experiences in Palliative Chemotherapy Care.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan Winda Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
Ineke C Nugterena Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van Laarhovenb Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
Henk C P M van Weerta Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
Inge Henselmansc Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile close collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and hospital specialists is considered important, the sharing of care responsibilities between GPs and oncologists during palliative chemotherapy has not been clearly defined.

objectiveEvaluate the opinions of GPs and oncologists about who should provide different aspects of care for patients receiving palliative chemotherapy.

designWe conducted semi-structured interviews using six hypothetical scenarios with purposively sampled GPs (n = 12) and oncologists (n = 10) in the Netherlands. Each represented an example of a clinical problem requiring different aspects of care: problems likely, or not, related to cancer or chemotherapy, need for decision support, and end-of-life care.

resultsGPs and oncologists agreed that GPs should provide end-of-life care and that they should be involved in decisions about palliative chemotherapy; however, for the other scenarios most participants considered themselves the most appropriate provider of care. Themes that emerged regarding who would provide the best care for the patients in the different scenarios were expertise, continuity of care, accessibility of care, doctor-patient relationship, and communication. Most participants mentioned improved communication between the GP and oncologist as being essential for a better coordination and quality of care.

conclusionGPs and oncologists have different opinions about who should ideally provide different aspects of care during palliative chemotherapy. Findings raise awareness of the differences in reasoning and approaches and in current communication deficits between the two groups of health professionals. These findings could be used to improve coordination and collaboration and, ultimately, better patient care as results demonstrated that both disciplines can add value to the care for patients with advanced cancer. Key points This study identified contrasting opinions of GPs and oncologists about who should provide different aspects of care for patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. Important themes that emerged were expertise, continuity of care, doctor-patient relations, accessibility of care, and communication. Although frequently using the same arguments, GPs and oncologists often considered themselves to be the most appropriate providers of palliative care.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelContinuity of Patient CareDelivery of Health CareFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNetherlandsOncology Service, HospitalPalliative CarePhysician-Patient RelationsAntineoplastic AgentsContinuity of CareInterdisciplinary CommunicationMedical OncologyPalliative CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30375906
PMCPMC6381534
OpenAlexW2899279377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.