ReviewExpert review of proteomics2018
Nanoproteomics comes of age.
Review in Expert review of proteomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of trap column properties and loading conditions for proteome profiling of single-cell-level sample inputs.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Mass Spectrometry-based Solutions for Single-cell Proteomics.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Review
- MSConnect: Open-Source, End-to-End Platform for Automated Mass Spectrometry Data Management, Analysis, and Visualization.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Digital Microfluidics for Sample Preparation in Low-Input Proteomics.Small methods · 2025Review
- Multicolumn Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography with Accelerated Offline Gradient Generation for Robust and Sensitive Single-Cell Proteome Profiling.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Open-tubular trap columns: towards simple and robust liquid chromatography separations for single-cell proteomics.Molecular omics · 2024Article
- Efficient and Sensitive Sample Preparation, Separations, and Data Acquisition for Label-Free Single-Cell Proteomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Data-Dependent Acquisition with Precursor Coisolation Improves Proteome Coverage and Measurement Throughput for Label-Free Single-Cell Proteomics.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023Article
- Polymeric Nanoparticles and Nanogels: How Do They Interact with Proteins?Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Omics and systems view of innate immune pathways.Proteomics · 2023Review
- Unlocking the potential of microfluidics in mass spectrometry-based immunopeptidomics for tumor antigen discovery.Cell reports methods · 2023Review
- Advancements in Oncoproteomics Technologies: Treading toward Translation into Clinical Practice.Proteomes · 2023Review
- Gold Nanoparticles Contact with Cancer Cell: A Brief Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Infrared Laser Ablation Microsampling with a Reflective Objective.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022Article
- Ultrasensitive NanoLC-MS of Subnanogram Protein Samples Using Second Generation Micropillar Array LC Technology with Orbitrap Exploris 480 and FAIMS PRO.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Characterization of cellular oxidative stress response by stoichiometric redox proteomics.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2021Review
- Deep Profiling of Microgram-Scale Proteome by Tandem Mass Tag Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Single-cell Proteomics: Progress and Prospects.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Review
- Automated Coupling of Nanodroplet Sample Preparation with Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Single-Cell Proteomics.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- Simple Method to Quantify Protein Abundances from 1000 Cells.ACS omega · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNanoproteomics, which is defined as quantitative proteome profiling of small populations of cells (<5000 cells), can reveal critical information related to rare cell populations, hard-to-obtain clinical specimens, and the cellular heterogeneity of pathological tissues. Areas covered: We present a brief review of the recent technological advances in nanoproteomics. These advances include new technologies or approaches covering major areas of proteomics workflow ranging from sample isolation, sample processing, high-resolution separations, to MS instrumentation. Expert commentary: We comment on the current state of nanoproteomics and discuss perspectives on both future technological directions and potential enabling applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.