ArticleArchives of rheumatology2016
The Risk of Nephrolithiasis Among Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: a Population-Based Cohort Study.
Article in Archives of rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Body fatness, diabetes, physical activity and risk of kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2018Pooled it
- Ankylosing spondylitis: an independent risk factor for nephrolithiasis and the prognostic value of follow-up CT.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Nephrolithiasis in ankylosing spondylitis and its relationship with disease assessment scales.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to investigate the correlation of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with nephrolithiasis by performing a nationwide population- based cohort study. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe data used in this retrospective cohort study were collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research database. The study included a total of 3,334 AS patients (1,914 males, 1,420 females; mean age 44.51±16.83 years; range 22 to 79 years) and 13,336 non-AS patients (7,656 males, 5,680 females; mean age 44.27±17.01 years; range 21 to 78 years) who had been followed-up on an average of 6.78 years and 6.75 years, respectively, between January 2000 and December 2008.
resultsThe percentage of newly diagnosed nephrolithiasis was 4.8% in all study subjects. However, the percentages of newly diagnosed nephrolithiasis were 5.76% and 4.58% in the AS and non-AS cohorts, respectively. After adjusting the patients' sex, age, urbanization level, and comorbidities, the hazard ratio obtained from our multivariable Cox model was 1.19.
conclusionOur study findings indicate that patients with AS are more likely to develop nephrolithiasis than non-AS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.