Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375492›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2019

Gestational weight gain targets during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy for women with gestational diabetes mellitus in China.

Jiang-Nan Wu, Wei-Rong Gu, Xi-Rong Xiao, Yi Zhang, Xiao-Tian Li, Chuan-Min Yin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiang-Nan WuDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Wei-Rong GuDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Xi-Rong XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Xiao-Tian LiDepartment of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. xiaotianli555@163.com.
Chuan-Min YinDepartment of Nutrition, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. yincmwujn@126.com.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNChildren's Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesGestational weight gain (GWG) recommendations for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in China are lacking. The present study aims to examine whether specific GWG targets for women with GDM can improve pregnancy outcomes in comparison with GWG according to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) targets. SUBJECTS/

methodsPregnant women diagnosed with GDM were selected from a retrospective cohort study of 8299 singleton pregnant women aged 18-45 years in 2012 (n = 1820). GWG ranges were calculated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (ROC targets) and the interquartile range (IR) method (the range from the 25th to 75th percentiles of the GWG among GDM women without adverse pregnancy outcomes, IR targets).

resultsThe incidences of small for gestational age (SGA) births and pregnancy hypertension among women with GDM who gained weight within the ROC targets were lower than the incidences in women who gained weight within the IOM targets (SGA, 7.5% vs. 8.6%; pregnancy hypertension, 12.6% vs. 14.1%; both P < 0.05). GWG was associated with a risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the total sample (estimated values ranged from -2.95 to 2.08, all P < 0.05). No statistically significant associations between GWG and adverse pregnancy outcomes were observed in subgroups of pregnant women with appropriate GWGs according to the ROC, IR, and IOM targets. The ROC targets exhibited higher negative predictive values for adverse pregnancy outcomes than the IR and IOM targets.

conclusionThe ROC targets improved pregnancy outcomes and thus represent potential special GWG guidelines for women with GDM in China.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Trimester, SecondPregnancy Trimester, ThirdAdolescentAdultChinaCohort StudiesDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGestational Weight GainHumansIncidenceInfant, Small for Gestational AgeMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPre-EclampsiaPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30375492
PMCPMC6760624
OpenAlexW2899084653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.