Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375461›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

DNA damage interactions on both nanometer and micrometer scale determine overall cellular damage.

Thomas Friedrich, Katarina Ilicic, Christoph Greubel, Stefanie Girst, Judith Reindl, Matthias Sammer, Benjamin Schwarz, Christian Siebenwirth, Dietrich W M Walsh, Thomas E Schmid and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Energy Deposition around Swift Carbon-Ion Tracks in Liquid Water.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas FriedrichGSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Department of Biophysics, Darmstadt, Germany. t.friedrich@gsi.de.
Katarina IlicicTU München, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Germany.
Christoph GreubelUniversität der Bundeswehr, München, Germany.
Stefanie GirstUniversität der Bundeswehr, München, Germany.
Judith ReindlUniversität der Bundeswehr, München, Germany.
Matthias SammerUniversität der Bundeswehr, München, Germany.
Benjamin SchwarzUniversität der Bundeswehr, München, Germany.
Christian SiebenwirthTU München, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Germany.
Dietrich W M WalshUniversität der Bundeswehr, München, Germany.
Thomas E SchmidTU München, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, München, Germany.
Michael ScholzGSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research, Department of Biophysics, Darmstadt, Germany.
Günther DollingerUniversität der Bundeswehr, München, Germany.
Universität der Bundeswehr München · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEGSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 02NUK031Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 02NUK31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSB) play a pivotal role for cellular damage, which is a hazard encountered in toxicology and radiation protection, but also exploited e.g. in eradicating tumors in radiation therapy. It is still debated whether and in how far clustering of such DNA lesions leads to an enhanced severity of induced damage. Here we investigate - using focused spots of ionizing radiation as damaging agent - the spatial extension of DNA lesion patterns causing cell inactivation. We find that clustering of DNA damage on both the nm and µm scale leads to enhanced inactivation compared to more homogeneous lesion distributions. A biophysical model interprets these observations in terms of enhanced DSB production and DSB interaction, respectively. We decompose the overall effects quantitatively into contributions from these lesion formation processes, concluding that both processes coexist and need to be considered for determining the resulting damage on the cellular level.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansLinear Energy TransferRadiation, Ionizing

Identifiers

PMID30375461
PMCPMC6207695
OpenAlexW2898345480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.