Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375452›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Gut Microbiota in a Large Population: a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Hee-Young Yoon, Han-Na Kim, Su Hwan Lee, Soo Jung Kim, Yoosoo Chang, Seungho Ryu, Hocheol Shin, Hyung-Lae Kim, Jin Hwa Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hee-Young YoonDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Han-Na KimMedical Research Institute, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Su Hwan LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Jung KimDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoosoo ChangCenter for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seungho RyuCenter for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hocheol ShinDepartment of Family Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hyung-Lae KimDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. hyung@ewha.ac.kr.
Jin Hwa LeeDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jinhwalee@ewha.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0843-9862

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) 2010-0027945National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2016R1A6A3A11932719National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) NRF-2018R1D1A1B07050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota and blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are associated with systemic inflammation; however, data on the association between gut microbiota and NLR are lacking. We investigated the association between gut microbiota and NLR. A total of 1,309 subjects who had available data on NLR and 16 S rRNA sequencing of gut microbiota were included in this study. They were grouped according to NLR quartile (Q) as follows: lower Q (n = 328, <25% of NLR range), middle 2Q (n = 653, ≥25% to <75%) and upper Q (n = 328, ≥75%). The diversity and composition of the human gut microbiota in the groups were calculated. The phylogenetic diversity of gut microbiota in the lower group was significantly higher than in the middle 2Q group (P = 0.040). The beta-diversity was significantly different among the three groups (P = 0.043), between the lower and middle 2Q groups (P = 0.029), and between the lower and upper groups (P = 0.026). Bacteroides eggerthii showed a positive correlation with NLR (q = 0.015). The diversity and composition of the gut microbiome were different between the NLR groups. Particularly, patients with a lower NLR had a greater diversity of gut microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeLeukocyte CountLymphocytesNeutrophilsAdultBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLymphocyte CountMiddle AgedPublic Health SurveillanceRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID30375452
PMCPMC6207698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.