ArticleScientific reports2018
Transcriptome analysis of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus exposed to cefotaxime.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fucoxanthin Potentiates the Bactericidal Activity of Cefotaxime Against Staphylococcus aureus.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- Synergistic Effect and Time-Kill Evaluation of Eugenol Combined with Cefotaxime Against Staphylococcus aureus.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- Innovative Strategies to Overcome Antimicrobial Resistance and Tolerance.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Influence of Sub-Inhibitory Dosage of Cefotaxime on Multidrug ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Genomic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates causing osteoarticular infections in otherwise healthy children.PloS one · 2022Article
- Global responses to oxytetracycline treatment in tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies on bacterial response to antibiotics mainly focused on susceptible strains. Here we characterized the transcriptional responses of distinct cephalosporin-resistant bacteria of public health relevance to cefotaxime (CTX), a cephalosporin widely used in clinical practice. Adaptation to therapeutic concentrations of CTX (30 µg/ml) was investigated by RNA sequencing in mid-exponential phase cultures of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and two genetically diverse E. coli producing CTX-M-15 or CMY-2 β-lactamase following genome sequencing and annotation for each strain. MRSA showed the most notable adaptive changes in the transcriptome after exposure to CTX, mainly associated with cell envelope functions. This reprogramming coincided with a transient reduction in cell growth, which also occurred in the CMY-2-producing E. coli but not in the CTX-M-15-producing strain. Re-establishment of growth in the CMY-2 producer proceeded without any notable adaptive transcriptional response, while limited reprogramming of gene transcription was observed in the CTX-M-15 producer. Our data show that the transcriptional response of CTX-resistant bacteria to CTX depends on the bacterial species, level of resistance and resistance determinant involved. Gene products induced in the presence of CTX may play an essential role for bacterial survival during therapy and merit further investigation as possible targets for potentiating CTX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.