Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375331›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Physiological constraint on acrobatic courtship behavior underlies rapid sympatric speciation in bearded manakins.

Meredith C Miles, Franz Goller, Matthew J Fuxjager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Layered evolution of gene expression in "superfast" muscles for courtship.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Meredith C MilesWake Forest University, Winston-Salem, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7307-0195
Franz GollerUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5333-1987
Matthew J FuxjagerWake Forest University, Winston-Salem, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-6854
Wake Forest University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

National Science Foundation IOS-1655730Wake Forest University N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiology's role in speciation is poorly understood. Motor systems, for example, are widely thought to shape this process because they can potentiate or constrain the evolution of key traits that help mediate speciation. Previously, we found that Neotropical manakin birds have evolved one of the fastest limb muscles on record to support innovations in acrobatic courtship display (Fuxjager et al., 2016a). Here, we show how this modification played an instrumental role in the sympatric speciation of a manakin genus, illustrating that muscle specializations fostered divergence in courtship display speed, which may generate assortative mating. However, innovations in contraction-relaxation cycling kinetics that underlie rapid muscle performance are also punctuated by a severe speed-endurance trade-off, blocking further exaggeration of display speed. Sexual selection therefore potentiated phenotypic displacement in a trait critical to mate choice, all during an extraordinarily fast species radiation-and in doing so, pushed muscle performance to a new boundary altogether.

Indexed as

CourtshipGenetic SpeciationSympatryAnimalsPasseriformesPhenotypePhylogenyRegression AnalysisSexual Behavior, AnimalWings, Animalcalcium traffickingcourtship displayevolutionary biologyneurosciencereproductive behaviorSkeletal musclespeciationtropical bird

Identifiers

PMID30375331
PMCPMC6207423
OpenAlexW2898719434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.