Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375246›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Long-Term Time-Varying Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Umesh N Khot, Michael J Johnson, Newton B Wiggins, Ashley M Lowry, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, Samir Kapadia, Venu Menon, Stephen G Ellis, Pamela Goepfarth, Eugene H Blackstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Umesh N Khot1 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation Cleveland OH.
Michael J Johnson1 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation Cleveland OH.
Newton B Wiggins1 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation Cleveland OH.
Ashley M Lowry2 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Research Institute Cleveland OH.
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran2 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Research Institute Cleveland OH.
Samir Kapadia3 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Cleveland OH.
Venu Menon3 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Cleveland OH.
Stephen G Ellis3 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Cleveland OH.
Pamela Goepfarth3 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Cleveland OH.
Eugene H Blackstone2 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Research Institute Cleveland OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Readmission after myocardial infarction ( MI ) is a publicly reported quality metric with hospital reimbursement linked to readmission rates. We describe the timing and pattern of readmission by cause within the first year after MI in consecutive patients, regardless of revascularization strategy, payer status, or age. Methods and Results We identified patients discharged after an MI from April 2008 to June 2012. Readmission within 12 months was the primary end point. Readmissions were classified into 4 groups: MI related, other cardiovascular, noncardiovascular, and planned. A total of 3069 patients were discharged after an MI (average age, 65±13 years; and 1941 [63%] men). A total of 655 patients (21.3%) were readmitted at least once (897 total readmissions). A total of 147 patients (4.8%) were readmitted ≥2 times, accounting for 389 readmissions (43%). The instantaneous risk of all-cause readmission was highest (15 readmissions/100 patients per month; 95% confidence interval, 12-19 readmissions/100 patients per month) immediately after discharge, decreased by almost half (8.1 readmissions/100 patients per month; 95% confidence interval, 7.2-9.0 readmissions/100 patients per month) within 15 days, and was substantially lower and relatively constant (1.4 readmissions/100 patients per month; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.6 readmissions/100 patients per month) out to 1 year. Cardiovascular causes of readmission were more common early after discharge. Conclusions Most patients with MI are never readmitted, whereas a small minority (≈5%) account for nearly half of 1-year readmissions. The readmission pattern after MI is characterized by an early peak (first 15 days) of cardiovascular readmissions, followed by a middle period (months 1-4) of noncardiovascular readmissions, and ending with a low-risk period (>4 months) during which the risk appears independent of cause.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient ReadmissionRisk AssessmentTime Factorscoronary heart diseasehospital readmission follow‐up studiesmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID30375246
PMCPMC6404216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.