Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375152›Full record

ArticleGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2019

Using human sequencing to guide craniofacial research.

Ryan P Liegel, Erin Finnerty, Lauren Blizzard, Andrew DiStasio, Robert B Hufnagel, Howard M Saal, Kristen L Sund, Cynthia A Prows, Rolf W Stottmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan P LiegelDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Erin FinnertyDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Lauren BlizzardDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Andrew DiStasioDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Robert B HufnagelDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Howard M SaalDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Kristen L SundDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Cynthia A ProwsDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.
Rolf W StottmannDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229.ORCID 0000-0003-4512-6806
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Genomic and epigenomic mechanisms of pediatric ocular disordersZIAEY000565 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI HUFNAGEL, ROBERT · 2019 to 2024
$11.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent convergence of technological innovations has re-energized the ability to apply genetics to research in human craniofacial development. Next-generation exome and whole genome sequencing have significantly dropped in price, making it relatively trivial to sequence and analyze patients and families with congenital craniofacial anomalies. A concurrent revolution in genome editing with the use of the CRISPR-Cas9 system enables the rapid generation of animal models, including mouse, which can precisely recapitulate human variants. Here, we summarize the choices currently available to the research community. We illustrate this approach with the study of a family with a novel craniofacial syndrome with dominant inheritance pattern. The genomic analysis suggested a causal variant in AMOTL1 which we modeled in mice. We also made a novel deletion allele of Amotl1. Our results indicate that Amotl1 is not required in the mouse for survival to weaning. Mice carrying the variant identified in the human sequencing studies, however, do not survive to weaning in normal ratios. The cause of death is not understood for these mice complicating our conclusions about the pathogenicity in the index patient. Thus, we highlight some of the powerful opportunities and confounding factors confronting current craniofacial genetic research.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAdultAngiomotinsAngiopoietin-Like Protein 1AnimalsCraniofacial AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutationSequence Analysis, DNAAMOTL1 protein, humanAmotl1 protein, mouseAngiomotinsAngiopoietin-Like Protein 1Membrane Proteinsbirth defectsmammalorganismprocess, geneticsprocess, neural crestprocess, organogenesistissuetissue, other

Identifiers

PMID30375152
PMCPMC8796141
OpenAlexW2949464146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.