Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30375065›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2019

Genomic signatures of experimental adaptive radiation in Drosophila.

Pawel Michalak, Lin Kang, Mads F Schou, Harold R Garner, Volker Loeschcke

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Experimental Evolution in a Warming World: The Omics Era.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Next-generation biological control: the need for integrating genetics and genomics.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Pawel MichalakEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0003-4890-8985
Lin KangEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Mads F SchouDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Harold R GarnerEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Volker LoeschckeDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine · USSpartanburg Regional Healthcare System · USVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

Bradley FoundationCarlsberg FoundationDanish Natural Science Research CouncilEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine (VCOM)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic environmental factors play a fundamental role in determining the distribution, abundance and adaptive diversification of species. Empowered by new technologies enabling rapid and increasingly accurate examination of genomic variation in populations, researchers may gain new insights into the genomic background of adaptive radiation and stress resistance. We investigated genomic variation across generations of large-scale experimental selection regimes originating from a single founder population of Drosophila melanogaster, diverging in response to ecologically relevant environmental stressors: heat shock, heat knock down, cold shock, desiccation and starvation. When compared to the founder population, and to parallel unselected controls, there were more than 100,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) displaying consistent allelic changes in response to selective pressures across generations. These SNPs were found in both coding and noncoding sequences, with the highest density in promoter regions, and involved a broad range of functionalities, including molecular chaperoning by heat-shock proteins. The SNP patterns were highly stressor-specific despite considerable variation among line replicates within each selection regime, as reflected by a principal component analysis, and co-occurred with selective sweep regions. Only ~15% of SNPs with putatively adaptive changes were shared by at least two selective regimes, while less than 1% of SNPs diverged in opposite directions. Divergent stressors driving evolution in the experimental system of adaptive radiation left distinct genomic signatures, most pronounced in starvation and heat-shock selection regimes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationSelection, GeneticAllelesAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterGenome, InsectGenotypeHaplotypesPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePromoter Regions, GeneticStress, PhysiologicalDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID30375065
OpenAlexW2899513595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.