ArticleStatistics in medicine2019
A Bayesian regularized mediation analysis with multiple exposures.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of pre-and postnatal mercury exposure with cardiometabolic risk factors in children: the role of the telomere length and telomerase reverse transcriptase polymorphisms.Environment international · 2025Article
- A Bayesian nonparametric approach for multiple mediators with applications in mental health studies.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Bayesian network mediation analysis with application to the brain functional connectome.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Intergenerational Associations Between Maternal Diet and Childhood Adiposity: A Bayesian Regularized Mediation Analysis.Statistics in biosciences · 2021Article
- Association Between Screen Time, Fast Foods, Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Adolescents.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mediation analysis assesses the effect of study exposures on an outcome both through and around specific mediators. While mediation analysis involving multiple mediators has been addressed in recent literature, the case of multiple exposures has received little attention. With the presence of multiple exposures, we consider regularizations that allow simultaneous effect selection and estimation while stabilizing model fit and accounting for model selection uncertainty. In the framework of linear structural-equation models, we analytically show that a two-stage approach regularizing regression coefficients does not guarantee a unimodal posterior distribution and that a product-of-coefficient approach regularizing direct and indirect effects tends to penalize excessively. We propose a regularized difference-of-coefficient approach that bypasses these limitations. Using the connection between regularizations and Bayesian hierarchical models with Laplace prior, we develop an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for posterior estimation and inference. Through simulations, we show that the proposed approach has better empirical performances compared to some alternatives. The methodology is illustrated using data from two epidemiological studies in human reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.