Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30374837›Full record

ReviewRadiological physics and technology2018

Potentials of radiomics for cancer diagnosis and treatment in comparison with computer-aided diagnosis.

Hidetaka Arimura, Mazen Soufi, Kenta Ninomiya, Hidemi Kamezawa, Masahiro Yamada

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiological physics and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hidetaka ArimuraDivision of Medical Quantum Science, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. arimurah@med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Mazen SoufiDivision of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan.
Kenta NinomiyaDivision of Medical Quantum Science, Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hidemi KamezawaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Fukuoka Medical Technology, Teikyo University, Omuta, Japan.
Masahiro YamadaDivision of Medical Quantum Science, Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is a field that is essentially based on pattern recognition that improves the accuracy of a diagnosis made by a physician who takes into account the computer's "opinion" derived from the quantitative analysis of radiological images. Radiomics is a field based on data science that massively and comprehensively analyzes a large number of medical images to extract a large number of phenotypic features reflecting disease traits, and explores the associations between the features and patients' prognoses for precision medicine. According to the definitions for both, you may think that radiomics is not a paraphrase of CAD, but you may also think that these definitions are "image manipulation". However, there are common and different features between the two fields. This review paper elaborates on these common and different features and introduces the potential of radiomics for cancer diagnosis and treatment by comparing it with CAD.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsPrognosisCancer diagnosis and treatmentComputer-aided diagnosisPrecision medicineRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.