Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30374687›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

Verification of the diagnostic strategy for anterior mediastinal tumors.

Shuhei Hakiri, Koji Kawaguchi, Takayuki Fukui, Shota Nakamura, Naoki Ozeki, Shunsuke Mori, Masaki Goto, Kumiko Hashimoto, Toshinari Ito, Kohei Yokoi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Ectopic cervical thymoma misdiagnosed as thyroid nodule:a case report].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuhei HakiriDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan. h-shuhei-1024@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Koji KawaguchiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Takayuki FukuiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Shota NakamuraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Naoki OzekiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Shunsuke MoriDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Masaki GotoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Kumiko HashimotoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Toshinari ItoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Kohei YokoiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Nagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline has suggested that complete excision of the tumor should be performed without a preoperative biopsy when resectable. However, little evidence has been provided to support this strategy. The purpose of this study was to review our diagnostic process and to evaluate the validity of radical resection of anterior mediastinal masses (AMMs) without pathological confirmation.

methodsA total of 254 patients underwent surgical resection for AMMs between 2004 and 2015. This study included 181 patients with likely TETs according to clinical features, serum levels of tumor markers and autoimmune-antibodies, and radiological findings. In addition, AMMs likely TETs were classified into resectable or unresectable tumors. We retrospectively reviewed the diagnostic process of those patients and validated surgical resection of AMMs without a definitive diagnosis.

resultsAmong 254 patients, 181 were suspected of having a TET based on the serum levels of tumor markers and autoimmune-antibodies and the radiological findings. Of them, 157 patients were deemed resectable and underwent surgical resection without histological confirmation, and 144 (92%) were diagnosed with TETs in the final pathological examinations. In 13 patients with non-TETs, the tumors were difficult to differentiate from TETs by imaging and clinical findings alone.

conclusionsA total of 92% of patients suspected of having a TET and who underwent complete resection without pathological confirmation were accurately diagnosed and properly treated. Surgical resection without a definitive diagnosis was feasible in patients suspected of having a TET when they were considered resectable.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMediastinal NeoplasmsMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialRetrospective StudiesThymus NeoplasmsTomography, X-RayBiomarkers, TumorAnterior mediastinum massPreoperative diagnosisThymic epithelial tumorThymoma

Identifiers

PMID30374687
OpenAlexW2899148392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.