ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019
Differences in mortality in Fusobacterium necrophorum and Fusobacterium nucleatum infections detected by culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variations in salivary microbiome and metabolites are associated with immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.mSystems · 2025Article
- Article
- Rare Case of Fusobacterium necrophorum Bacteremia and Pleural Empyema Originating from a Burn Ulcer in a 16-Year-Old Female Patient.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- [Impact of preservatives in topicals on the cutaneous microbiota].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Clinical Differences in Patients Infected withAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fusobacterium species are components of the normal microbiota of the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and female genital tract. They are increasingly recognized as causative agents of oral, laryngeal, and tonsillar infections. Several fusobacterial species are involved in infections, with F. necrophorum and F. nucleatum being the most commonly cultured subtypes. In this study, we aimed to investigate clinical and prognostic differences in terms of mortality and association with malignancy between F. necrophorum and F. nucleatum detected by culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. This is a systematic, comparative, retrospective, non-interventional study. Data were extracted from the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Region Zealand, Denmark: all patients with F. necrophorum or F. nucleatum detected by culture or 16S rRNA gene sequencing from 1st of January 2010 to 30th of June 2015 were included. In total, F. necrophorum was detected in samples from 75 patients, and F. nucleatum in samples from 68 patients (total: n = 143). Thirteen patients had a current cancer diagnosis at the time of fusobacterial sampling. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant association of "current cancer" with 30-day mortality. Fusobacterial subtype was not associated with mortality neither in overall nor in subgroups with or without current cancer. Despite differences in clinical disease pattern between F. necrophorum and F. nucleatum, mortality was unaffected by fusobacterial subtype. Mortality was significantly related to comorbidity, especially a current diagnosis of cancer. Our data highlights the current debate whether fusobacterial involvement in cancer may have disease-altering properties, rather than being opportunistic pathogens secondary to cancer disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.