Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30374684›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Differences in mortality in Fusobacterium necrophorum and Fusobacterium nucleatum infections detected by culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Katrine M Johannesen, Shailesh B Kolekar, Nikolaos Greve, Xiaohui Chen Nielsen, Toke Seierøe Barfod, Uffe Bodtger

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Journal of oral microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical Differences in Patients Infected withAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Katrine M JohannesenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Næstved Hospital, 61 Ringstedgade, DK-4700, Næstved, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-3109
Shailesh B KolekarDepartment of Respiratory and Internal Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Nikolaos GreveDepartment of Respiratory and Internal Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Xiaohui Chen NielsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Toke Seierøe BarfodDepartment of Respiratory and Internal Medicine, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark.
Uffe BodtgerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Næstved Hospital, 61 Ringstedgade, DK-4700, Næstved, Denmark. ubt@regionsjaelland.dk.
Zealand University Hospital · DKRingsted Sygehus · DKSlagelse Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusobacterium species are components of the normal microbiota of the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and female genital tract. They are increasingly recognized as causative agents of oral, laryngeal, and tonsillar infections. Several fusobacterial species are involved in infections, with F. necrophorum and F. nucleatum being the most commonly cultured subtypes. In this study, we aimed to investigate clinical and prognostic differences in terms of mortality and association with malignancy between F. necrophorum and F. nucleatum detected by culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. This is a systematic, comparative, retrospective, non-interventional study. Data were extracted from the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Region Zealand, Denmark: all patients with F. necrophorum or F. nucleatum detected by culture or 16S rRNA gene sequencing from 1st of January 2010 to 30th of June 2015 were included. In total, F. necrophorum was detected in samples from 75 patients, and F. nucleatum in samples from 68 patients (total: n = 143). Thirteen patients had a current cancer diagnosis at the time of fusobacterial sampling. Multivariate analyses revealed a significant association of "current cancer" with 30-day mortality. Fusobacterial subtype was not associated with mortality neither in overall nor in subgroups with or without current cancer. Despite differences in clinical disease pattern between F. necrophorum and F. nucleatum, mortality was unaffected by fusobacterial subtype. Mortality was significantly related to comorbidity, especially a current diagnosis of cancer. Our data highlights the current debate whether fusobacterial involvement in cancer may have disease-altering properties, rather than being opportunistic pathogens secondary to cancer disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDenmarkDNA, BacterialFemaleFusobacterium InfectionsFusobacterium necrophorumFusobacterium nucleatumHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SYoung AdultDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SF. necrophorumF. nucleatumFusobacteriaInfectionsMortality

Identifiers

PMID30374684
OpenAlexW2898924339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.