ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2018
On the practical aspects of characterising monoamine oxidase inhibition in vitro.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parameter Reliability and Understanding Enzyme Function.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Stereoselective Activity of 1-Propargyl-4-styrylpiperidine-like Analogues That Can Discriminate between Monoamine Oxidase Isoforms A and B.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The development of novel inhibitors of human monoamine oxidase enzymes with improved pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles has, in the past, been hampered by limited access to enzyme, by assay protocols offering limited throughput, and by inappropriate analyses of kinetic data. More recently, high-level expression of human enzymes in yeast has facilitated thorough examinations of steady-state enzyme behaviour that have led to improvements in our understanding of the mathematical underpinnings of kinetic analyses of monoamine oxidases. However, with these improvements have come a realisation that to be useful, more data points across wider concentration ranges are required. In turn, many discontinuous assay approaches, such as those involving radiolabelled substrates or chromatographic separation of product from substrate, have been rendered somewhat obsolete. Justification for the use of a platereader-based approach to assess the effects of novel inhibitors on monamine oxidases is provided, along with details of experimental design optimised to address the unexpectedly complex kinetics followed by these enzymes. Potential sources of error are discussed, and comments provided on techniques that may enhance the quality of experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30374594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.