ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019
Enhanced recovery program for minimally invasive and vaginal urogynecologic surgery.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in elder patients undergoing transvaginal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP): a multicenter randomized parallel open-label controlled trial.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Trial
- Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on older patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery: a randomised controlled trial.BMC medicine · 2025Trial
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Conventional Care in Elderly Patients Undergoing Transvaginal Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery and Enhanced Recovery and Outcomes: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Exploration of enhanced recovery after surgery in female pelvic floor reconstruction: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Healthcare Resource Utilization Following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy: Impact of Concomitant Rectopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Enhanced Recovery after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Safety and economics of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in pelvic reconstructive surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Effect of Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Opioid Use in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery · 2021Article
- Patient experience with enhanced recovery and early discharge after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a qualitative study.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Perioperative opioid prescriptions associated with stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse surgery.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Commentary on "Enhanced recovery program for minimally invasive and vaginal urogynecologic surgery".International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Factors that Lengthen Patient Hospitalizations Following Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisEnhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are evidenced-based interventions designed to standardize perioperative care and expedite recovery to baseline functional status after surgery. There remains a paucity of data addressing the effect of ERPs on pelvic reconstructive surgery patients.
methodsAn ERP was implemented at our institution including: patient counseling, carbohydrate loading, avoidance of opioids, goal-directed fluid resuscitation, immediate postoperative feeding and early ambulation. Patients undergoing elective pelvic reconstructive surgery before and after implementation of the ERP were identified in this cohort study.
resultsOne hundred eighteen patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery within the ERP compared with 76 historic controls. Reductions were seen in length of hospital stay (29.9 vs. 27.9 h, p = 0.04), total morphine equivalents (37.4 vs. 19.4 mg, p < 0.01) and total intravenous fluids administered (2.7 l vs. 1.5 l, p < 0.0001). Hospital discharges before noon doubled (32.9 vs. 60.2%, p < 0.01). More patients in the ERP group ambulated on the day of surgery (17.1 vs. 73.7%, p < 0.01) and ambulated at least two times the day following surgery (34.2 vs. 72.9%, p < 0.01). No differences were seen in average pain scores (highest pain score 7.39 vs. 7.37, p = 0.95), hospital readmissions (3.9 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.84), or postoperative complications (6.58 vs. 8.47%, p = 0.79). Patient satisfaction significantly improved. ERP was not associated with an increase in 30-day total hospital costs.
conclusionsImplementation of ERP for pelvic reconstructive surgery patients was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased administration of intravenous fluids and opioids without an increase in complications, readmissions, or hospital costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.